[wodinoneeye]

It wont matter how many times they are proven wrong, the Bush Haters/Head-in-the-Sand brigade will just move on to their next raft of lies/fabrications and shriek all the louder.

[Lorianne]

Wow. Hard hitting. I like it.

[woofie]

We need more people to lay it out like this

[Jeff Chandler]

Published on Page A19 of the Post, probably ignored by the rest of the Jihaddi Media.

[Shery]

Good report, but what's the possibility of it getting feet?

[bpjam]

The amount of distortion and spin about this issue coming out right now is so clearly orchestrated is practically a TV show. Feith is being labeled one of the NeoCon/PNAC/Jews/GoToWarForIsrael cabal which supposedly dominated the White House in 2002/3 and drove poor, stupid W into invading Iraq so we could please our buddies in Tel Aviv (oh yeah, and get the Iraqi oil and get revenge for Saddam trying to kill 41)

Aside from the fact that the whole 'neo-con' thing is actually a liberal anti-semitism directed as Republican Jews (who are just as bad as Democrat Jews to the anti-Capitalism, anti-American activists), they are doing exactly what they claim Feith and other did.

They are cherry picking sentences out of thousands of reports to fit their own view of the intelligence. They are having to bend so far over backwards to find the angle at which their story needs to be viewed in order to make sense that they probably have a slipped disc by now. And its stunning how little the MSM knows about intelligence reports or intelligence gathering considering how many stories they write about it (or leak about it). They understand intelligence agencies less than they understand economics. And that is saying something.

[syriacus]

Levin behaves like a potentate.His word is law.

[Smartaleck]

Recall too that the Wash Post had to write a correction for wrongly attributing words to the IG report when in fact they were from the self serving Dem political hack Carl Levin!

[Enchante]

Great column, which means it will be ignored or sneered at by all certifiable members of the DBM.

Gimble has just enough intellectual conscience that he could not give the slimedogs like Levin what they really wanted, which was an all-out blast against Feith's office. So instead Gimble adds the gratuitous, misguided swipe at the one presentation as "inappropriate." As Feith has shown here, that criticism is absurd and dangerous.

"Gimble's characterization is absurdly circular. Cheered on by the chairmen of the Senate intelligence and armed services committees, he is giving bad advice based on incomplete fact-finding and poor logic. He is discouraging tough questioning of intelligence. Our government needs more such questioning, not less."