Posted on 02/13/2007 4:42:15 PM PST by PhiKapMom
She had a link to a document that I had found and all I said was I had found the same document and never went back on the thread until I was told she was banned. My document was an updated version I found out later.
Then I have been followed around and told the person to LEAVE ME ALONE posting what the Admin Moderator said so I figured I would just stay off the Hunter threads for good and not take a chance. We have been told to get off FR by Freepers over and over again.
Just not going to take a chance.
So why then have the Rudy boosters trumpeted Congressional endorsements over the last two days?
Flea flicker or triple end around, quarterback fly?
You never recanted. You never apologized for misleading the forum. I pinged you to the refutation. TWICE. You refused to say "my bad". And all you do is run around claiming that if you aren't 100 percent for Duncan Hunter, you get banned.
Which is a bald-faced lie. As bald-faced as the attack you and AmeriBrit promulgated about Hunter.
And that is a lie as well. YOU ACTIVELY PROMOTED THE NOTION THAT THE DOCUMENT IN QUESTION IMPLICATED HUNTER.
If I posted a grisly abortion photo, you may have a point. I posted a descriptive, black and white diagram used to demonstrate each step of the procedure. Here's a similar medical illustration but in color this time:
Letter from Anthony P. Levatino, M.D., J.D., former abortionist, explaining that the images shown above "accurately depict" the partial-birth abortion method, and that "the images are size-appropriate to a fetus of approximately 24 weeks gestation." -- March 4, 2003
Letter from Watson A. Bowes, Jr., M.D., co-editor-in-chief of the journal Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, explaining that the images shown above "accurately depict" the partial-birth abortion method being used on "a fetus of approximately 24 weeks gestation." -- March 6, 2003
And you complain that I'm "subjecting FReepers" to that kind of stuff?!!! Giuliani subjected thousands of children to that kind of stuff with taxpayer funds and he was proud of it and promised more. He opposed the Partial Birth Abortion ban - even the one with the line about life of the mother - at the federal and state levels. He said that he agreed with Bill Clinton for vetoing the ban and opposed the Republican majority Congress for passing it. When Wolf Blitzer asked him if he supported Partial Birth Abortion, Rudy answered that he was "firm in his position" on the issue.
And then you put up that ridiculous crap that somehow we enjoy the diagrams or that they give us a "thrill". You are disgusting - lower than low. You know precisely why it was posted and you're fighting the effect of the post as hard as you can. Instead of trying to defend Giuliani's heinous position that he stated in his own words on national TV, you have to call the post spam, or that it hurts your eyes, or that we somehow enjoy looking at such things. What we enjoy is telling the truth about abortion and those who support it. And if that makes you uncomfortable or angry, then you should examine exactly why that would be the case and maybe change some of your own thinking.
OK guys. Time out here. I understand the visceral reaction against Rudy, but its not necessary to get in these gals faces anymore. They know what Rudy's positions are now, and they will have plenty of time to mull over whether they will continue to support him. The winds in the GOP are blowing Rudy's way for the moment, we have to work ot get our guy some exposure, but pissing off Rudy fans will not be overly advantageous. the real fight with Rudy will be if/when we can get a conservative alternative in the top tier.
There are plenty of good freepers that like Rudy, for many reasons, but they will not budge until we develop and present the alternative that is viable. So lets concentrate on that instead of jumping on the Rudy fans.
How did Ronald Reagan stop partial birth abortions?
Christopher Hitchens once said you cannot eat enough to vomit enough.
You cannot post those images enough to show what is at stake here. The same folks who decry terrorists beheading captives apparently don't want to acknowledge that innocent children are beheaded by that procedure.
Those are NOT abortion photos. They are medical diagrams that leave out all of the blood and gore. And if you're afraid a child will feel about that, how will you ever explain your support for Giuliani who supports the Partial Birth Abortion procedure.
More anti-Reagan slime from the Rudy boosters.
PBA was not a known issue until 1990.
The old Statue of Liberty.
Methinks the real issue is that you don't want to see the infantcide that Rudy has supported.
How did Ronald Reagan stop partial birth abortions?
Hmmm. One engaged in a smear campaign against Hunter and refused to recant doing such. The other has an issue with posting the facts about PBA.
You truly are a maggot. After being told the facts, you still stick to the spin.
You never recanted your slanderous attacks on Hunter, either. Don't lecture us about what people get away with.
Spot on!
I agree, it's too early. Some of these people are going to have egg on their face as soon as the DNC/Clintoon Machine gets revved up and starts checking the closets for skeletons. You know it's coming.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.