Hillary will walk away from Iraq, our troops, and the WOT ... Rudy won't.
I have a very personal stake in the WOT. I happen to know this person feels the same way I do
If you can walk away smiling from the killing of 47,000, 000 babies on the basis of an implausible hypothetical medical situation, how can I believe anything you say?
So I see no difference - and frankly, I think Hillary is scarier - if it's all about personal protection get the scary person.
You chose a poor example for difference between Rudy and Hillary (not talking about the WOT). Rudy is also "Pro-Choice" -
But I do understand the stakes in the WOT - but our current administration and the previous Republican-majority Congress chose to only half-fight the WOT. How can we possibly be fighting a WOT when our borders are less secure than the average mailbox?
Rudy's only strong point in my mind is his support of the WOT - then again, he has a personal stake in it, now doesn't he?!
Too many liberals do not have an investment in the WOT.
But there are other Republican names out there that are just as strong on the WOT, but are also much more conservative in just about every way.
If we vote an liberal into office - the WOT will proceed to be even more irrelevant, as we will loose what the Islamists want to destroy anyway- our strength and our freedom.
If you think he was smiling on the morning of 9/11, you're dumber than I thought.
"So I see no difference - and frankly, I think Hillary is scarier - if it's all about personal protection get the scary person." Since the Witch would be likely to join those from whom we need protection that is a surefire prescription for disaster. But this irresponsibility has been long recognized in the Implacables. They will contribute nothing in 08.