You chose a poor example for difference between Rudy and Hillary (not talking about the WOT). Rudy is also "Pro-Choice" -
But I do understand the stakes in the WOT - but our current administration and the previous Republican-majority Congress chose to only half-fight the WOT. How can we possibly be fighting a WOT when our borders are less secure than the average mailbox?
Rudy's only strong point in my mind is his support of the WOT - then again, he has a personal stake in it, now doesn't he?!
Too many liberals do not have an investment in the WOT.
But there are other Republican names out there that are just as strong on the WOT, but are also much more conservative in just about every way.
If we vote an liberal into office - the WOT will proceed to be even more irrelevant, as we will loose what the Islamists want to destroy anyway- our strength and our freedom.
Hillary will express displeasure with some terroist leader and one of her peons will kill him for her.
What is Rudy going to do?
kick some homeless people around? Help women kill their babies?
What is he going to do that Hillary won't do?
If he can walk away from 47,000,000 dead people, smiling, how can I trust him more than I trust Hillary
It's not like she is on her third husband