Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TitansAFC
The argument will quickly change to "Yes, I guess you can technically be Pro-Roe and still be a 'strict constructionist.'" And we'll hear justification after justification after justification.....

Well said. I won't be taken again. Bush, a man who has mild convictions in the pro-life area, would probably have named a pro-choice judge to the bench by now if the pressure against it hadn't been relentless.

Why, then, should conservatives expect Giuliani, a man who shares none of our convictions, to go against them with every judicial appointment?

296 posted on 02/13/2007 3:29:45 PM PST by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Zack Nguyen
Bush, a man who has mild convictions in the pro-life area, would probably have named a pro-choice judge to the bench by now if the pressure against it hadn't been relentless.

I can't let your statement go unchallenged. President Bush came out strongly against federally-funded new strains of embryonic stem cell research. He took major heat for that.

If that's a mild conviction on his part, then I suppose you think Eric Rudolph had moderate views.

306 posted on 02/13/2007 3:41:10 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson