The left eating their own. Got to love that!
..fat chance of hearing anything close. Two reasons, a liberal never ever admits to being wrong..second, the MSM will not pound such questions at her...it just ain't gonna happen
The biggest explanation she owes is why she should breath the same air as the rest of us. I would like to see her answer for why she's not an oxygen thief.
No..... that was her husband who did that.
"CLINTON: Good evening.
Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.
The hard fact is that so long as Saddam remains in power, he threatens the well-being of his people, the peace of his region, the security of the world.
The best way to end that threat once and for all is with a new Iraqi government -- a government ready to live in peace with its neighbors, a government that respects the rights of its people."
President Clinton
Oval Office Address to the American People
December 16, 1998
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
The White House had the same level of intelligence on Iraq as GWB. The Clinton position (along with most of the rest of the world) was Iraq required regime change, had WMD, and was a major supporter of terrorists.
There is no indication (anywhere) that the situation on the ground or the intelligence picture changed dramatically in the 1.5 years of Bush before her vote.
The MSM never calls her on this since it exposes the position of the DEMs on Iraq prior to Bush.
While this might seem like a hit piece on Hillary, it is just more MSM air cover for the DEMs. (So what if it wings Hillary, Obama is 'elevated' in this piece)
.
So she was for the war before she was against the war. Where have I heard that before? Hmmm....
What a liar! Maybe she might recall this...
"My Administration has pursued, and will continue to pursue, these objectives through active application of all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions. The evidence is overwhelming that such changes will not happen under the current Iraq leadership."
And was this from Pres. Bush?...NO, it was signed by WILLIAM J. CLINTON on Oct. 31, 1998...maybe the liar might recall the Iraq Liberation Act that her husband signed.
We've sent it to everyone we know, and FReepers may want to do likewise.
http://www.freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html
(can anyone hotlink it?)
Hmmm ... nothing about "regime change"-1998 or that pesky little co-declaration of war that Hussein/Osama made on us about a year later.
She absolutely owes an explanation, as do the others. Blaming Bush is only going to take them so far. She has no leadership skills whatsoever.
Wow! Is Cohen an Edwards boot-licker or an Obama Hussein boot-licker? Because there has to be some kind of an agenda behind a moonbat taking a swing at a communist.
Gee Mr. Cohen, the answer seems quite obvious. Clinton sees she won't get any political mileage from a pro-war stance, which she assumed when she voted to support it. Fortunately, in Liberalville, everything is Bush's fault and she won't be held to account.
bookmark bump