To: pissant
Now the question is: are conservatives going to cede the party to that wing of the GOP in hopes of having an electable guy. I say no. You're probably going against the tide around here. It's astonishing what's happened in just a few weeks. The electorate turned to the Democrats largely because of frustration over the war in Iraq. But the Dems, many of whom had supported the war at its onset, have no real ideas about how to improve the situation there. So they have been promoting their leftist social agenda. To counteract them, the GOP is now focusing on a candidate who (a) has a social agenda as leftist as any the Dems propose and (b) supports President Bush's increasingly unpopular position on Iraq. This is the electable candidate? I don't think so.
29 posted on
02/12/2007 5:56:20 PM PST by
madprof98
("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
To: madprof98
As far as I'm concerned, Rudy's support of the war is the ONLY thing going for him.
45 posted on
02/12/2007 6:02:46 PM PST by
pissant
To: madprof98
"The electorate turned to the Democrats largely because of frustration over the war in Iraq. But the Dems, many of whom had supported the war at its onset, have no real ideas about how to improve the situation there. So they have been promoting their leftist social agenda. To counteract them, the GOP is now focusing on a candidate who (a) has a social agenda as leftist as any the Dems propose and (b) supports President Bush's increasingly unpopular position on Iraq. This is the electable candidate? I don't think so."
I wish I'd written this. Well said and spot on.
107 posted on
02/12/2007 8:55:59 PM PST by
Luke21
To: madprof98
what happened is that the far social right was so stunned that their champions ...George Allen and Rick Santuram couldn't even hold their own states they don't have varsity player and the game has started. They are lashing out in frustration and rage.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson