2008 NY State Poll PING
Wow - I'm surprised that Giuliani fares so poorly in NY. I know it's heavily Democrat, but even so...that's a large deficit.
Hill, Hill, she's our man....
No republican will ever win in NY for three simple reasons... NYC, Rochester, and Buffalo.
Obviously, the voters of New York are supporting the person who has spent so much of her life living in the state, and working to help its residents improve their lives. Plus, she's a Yankees fan.
It's not a good sign that he can't even beat her in his own state.
I can't believe the power this woman has. It's mind boggling. There must be something in the water that makes people stupid.
"For Clinton, her strength is her backside is broad and impressive, but the real question is, How deep is it?"
RINO-rudy moving to the right, is just as "GENUINE" as the ICE QUEEN's move to the "center".
NEITHER of these political-expediency CHAMELION scumbags can be trusted.
Yep, as expected, Rudy's not quite left enough so the witch wins by a whisker.
No doubt many NYers long for Dinkin's Time.
So Hillary! cleans up in what is arguably the most 'Rat-infested state in the country? Big shock there.
If you believe this, I have a bridge you might like to buy...
Hillary strikes fear into the hearts of her enemies. Never underestimate the power of fear. Saddam understood it well.
Here's a poll question I'd like to see answered, even a state poll of 600 likely New York voters:
Would you vote for a person who ignored the threat of terrorists for 8 years while she was co-president?
Would you vote for a person who ran away from any opportunities to reform and extend the major "entitlements" so many in the middle class depend upon (Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid)?
Would you vote for a person who allowed government secrets to be given away to Red China in exchange for campaign donations? Who sold overnights in the Lincoln bedroom for political support? Who repaid donations with presidential pardons?
Would you vote for a person who was co-president when we opted for a nuclear arms treaty with North Korea (only to find that they started violating it 24 hours after the ink was dry)?
Would you vote for a person who tried (and failed) to come up with a nationalized healthcare plan that would have put Canada to shame? What if I told you that her investment advisor (managing her "blind trust") was shorting the stocks of pharmaceutical companies and health management companies while she was planning the takeover of the health care industry?
Would you vote for the person who "wants to take all the profits from the oil companies" and give it to government bureaucrats to "come up with alternative energy sources"?
That's the poll I would like to see taken.
Kind of like choosing your own form of execution. "Well Sir shall it be the Hangman's Noose, The Marksman's Rifle, or the Garote?"
As a New Yorker, this poll is probably pretty accurate. the vast majority of NY'ers just don't get it. They saw 3,000 of their neighbors brutally murdered on 9/11 and have no recollection of it.
America is an increasingly liberal country. I noticed it started in the early 1990s probably is response to the 1990-91 recession which, unlike previous recessions, hit white collar workers hardest. But I think here it is:
1. People dont remember liberalism, we really havent had it since 1980. We will probably be forced to go thru a decade or so of real liberal policies, that will result in a poorer weaker america circa 1980.
2. Conservatives have stopped articulating conservatism
Periodically thru american history, the country has experienced periods where the country moved sharply leftward. The Progressive Era, New Deal, Great Society. It seems we are on the threshold of another era of liberalism.
Frankly, if the GOP candidate is going to lose no matter who they are, it might as well be a RINO.
New Yawkers never fail to live down to my expectations.