Skip to comments.
Poll Favors Giuliani In New Hampshire
Yahooooo via AP ^
| 2/12/07
Posted on 02/12/2007 6:43:36 AM PST by areafiftyone
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 361-364 next last
To: Reagan Man
Btw, using historic facts and the truth of his own record isn't bad mouthing Rudy. The same applies for any other politician -- including the distinguished President Reagan.
To: Reagan Man
I'm in the ladder contingent.IIRC Firemen supported Rudy also.
To: MilesBennell
223
posted on
02/12/2007 9:05:08 AM PST
by
areafiftyone
(RUDY GIULIANI 2008 - STRENGTH AND LEADERSHIP)
To: antisocial
Homosexuality was a crime in the Soviet Union from 1933 till it collapsed.
To: antisocial
Yes, there's some activity on the NH message board, as well as a couple of Duncan Hunter supporters. It's still pretty early to plunge into supporting a presidential candidate, though, and I'm sure things will heat up in the fall.
To: antisocial
He also had no record of supporting homos and gun control. He publicly supported his good friend Rock Hudson in his bout with AIDS. Reagan cared for everyone, including "homos", because he was probably the most decent man we ever had as President who never hated anyone in his life.
To: areafiftyone
To: LiveFree99
It's still pretty early to plunge into supporting a presidential candidate, though, and I'm sure things will heat up in the fall.
You're 100% wrong.
If you really support any candidate OTHER than the main triumverate you literally need to sell your house, home, wife and kids and give that money to the candidate NOW. I'm only 25% joking about that.
I've been pointing out for weeks and now you're seeing articles talking about the incredible front-loading of the primaries and how short the primary campaign will be and how money-dependent it will be.
To: You Dirty Rats
They are issues important enough to Republicans to be in the Party Platform. Giuliani disagrees with the party and the platform on the majority of issues. His divorces, in this context, are irrelevant as they are not in the Democrat or Republican party platforms to which I'm comparing Giuliani's views.
229
posted on
02/12/2007 9:09:04 AM PST
by
Spiff
(Rudy Giuliani Quote (NY Post, 1996) "Most of Clinton's policies are very similar to most of mine.")
To: Strategerist
Reagan was a wonderful human being -- perhaps the greatest, kindest and certainly most compassionate President we ever had -- but he was a human being. Like all of us, he had his flaws -- he just had fewer than most of us.
To: Wormwood; mariabush
Since she had already stated that it was tongue in cheek, I don't know why you think it was serious. Why are you trying to make in into a major incident?
231
posted on
02/12/2007 9:09:24 AM PST
by
TommyDale
(Who do you trust? An ex-mayor? Or the ranking member of the House Committee on Armed Services?)
To: TommyDale
I am only concerened with the social conservatives' opinions. Fine, but that doesn't make a whole lot of sense for predicting outcome, which is the topic of this thread.
232
posted on
02/12/2007 9:12:16 AM PST
by
freespirited
(Demand perfection, get Hillary.)
To: You Dirty Rats; Spiff
>>>>> Now I am sure I will be accused of "attacking" Reagan ... And here I thought you were one of those 11th commandment type of guys.
Come on. Spiff`s chart doesn't obfuscate the truth about Rudy and Hillary. It exposes Rudy for being as liberal as Hillary is, more in tune with the politics of the Democratic Party then the GOP. Party platforms have meaning. Can't ignore Rudy`s entire political career as a liberal. That is just asking for trouble.
233
posted on
02/12/2007 9:13:21 AM PST
by
Reagan Man
(Conservatives don't vote for liberals.)
To: freespirited
Actually, if social conservatives turn their back on Giuliani, it will be a disastrous outcome.
234
posted on
02/12/2007 9:14:07 AM PST
by
TommyDale
(Who do you trust? An ex-mayor? Or the ranking member of the House Committee on Armed Services?)
To: You Dirty Rats; Spiff; Reagan Man
Reagan -- campaigned for welfare reform but didn't get it done. Clinton -- signed welfare reform bill. Oh, that's rich. Reagan never had both houses controlled by the GOP. Is there NO BOTTOM to the political depravity the Rudy boosters will engage in?
235
posted on
02/12/2007 9:20:00 AM PST
by
dirtboy
(Duncan Hunter 08)
To: dirtboy
You of course managed to miss the entire point of his post.
To: noname07718
"Number 1 on my list is the WOT"
The war on terror is important, however that's the ONLY positive Rudy has , as I see it. As far as the current front in the WOT (Iraqi), it will likely be decided before the next election. We will be on our way out...
If our homeland is attack again big time, the WOT won't even be a republican issue. Either party will strike back. A democrat may even be tougher than a republican, since he or she would have a freer hand to respond.
I would caution you not to sacrifice your conservative ideals for the WOT. It's not a republican war, and the only reason the democrats are against it is because they are superficially against anything Bush is for. If the democrats had been in power when the Towers came down, there would still have been a war on terror.
237
posted on
02/12/2007 9:23:28 AM PST
by
babygene
(Never look into the laser with your last good eye...)
To: areafiftyone
Most interesting article.
238
posted on
02/12/2007 9:23:38 AM PST
by
Ciexyz
(In all thy ways acknowledge Him, and He shall direct thy paths. Proverbs 3:6)
To: You Dirty Rats
If you want to say that he isn't a Conservative, that's sensible; to claim he is not a Republican is utter nonsense. Come on. I didn't say anything of the sort. You're reading what you want into what I wrote.
239
posted on
02/12/2007 9:24:34 AM PST
by
Theo
(Global warming "scientists." Pro-evolution "scientists." They're both wrong.)
To: areafiftyone
I see we're continuing to add new people! And I saw two comments just today from people who said they weren't sure about Rudy but when they read the ugliness posted by the same people who posted crap about Bush, they decided that enough was enough.
240
posted on
02/12/2007 9:24:43 AM PST
by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 361-364 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson