Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mexifornia, Five Years Later
City Journal ^ | Winter 2007 | Victor Davis Hanson

Posted on 02/12/2007 5:06:39 AM PST by T.L.Sink

Los Angeles is the second-largest Mexican city in the world. It makes little sense to screen tourists, inspect cargo containers, and check the passenger lists of incoming flights, when our border remains porous. It is absolutely correct that the best way for jihadist cells to cross into the United States is from Mexico.

At the same time, focus has turned more to the U.S.-born children of illegal immigrants, in whom illegitimacy, school dropout rates, and criminal activity have risen to such [high] levels.

Since 1990 the numbers of poor Mexican-Americans has climbed 52 percent.

Half of births to Hispanic-Americans were illegitimate, 42 percent higher than the general rate of the American population.

Education levels reveal the same dismal pattern - nearly half of all Hispanics are not graduating from high school in four years. Of those who do graduate, only one in five will have completed a high school curriculum that qualifies for college enrollment. Meanwhile, one in three Mexican-American males between the ages of 18 and 24 report being arrested, one in five has been jailed, and 15,000 illegal aliens are currently in the California penal system.

Even the influx of illegals into our quiet valley has become a flood. I have had drivers leave the road, plow into my vineyard and abandon their cars, without evidence of either registration or insurance. On each occasion, I've seen them simply walk or run away from the scene of thousands of dollars in damage. Similarly, an intoxicated driver who ran a stop sign hit my car broadside and then fled the scene. Our farmhouse in the Central Valley has been broken into three times. We used to have an open yard; now it is walled with steel gates on the driveway.

Such anecdotes have become common currency in the American Southwest.

(Excerpt) Read more at city-journal.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; US: California
KEYWORDS: buildit; bushbash; fence; reaganamnesty; vdh; wall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
By the way, the Hispanic Mayor of Los Angeles, Villaraigosa, recently stated that the multitude of gangs ravaging L.A. County, 60% of whom are illegals, should NOT mean greater border security. Conflict of interests here?
1 posted on 02/12/2007 5:06:41 AM PST by T.L.Sink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink
In addition to building a Wall at our Mexican border, I feel we should also build a Wall around Los Angeles and maybe California! Mexifornia is only too real and in significant part is destroying this nation
2 posted on 02/12/2007 5:10:02 AM PST by MBB1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink

save


3 posted on 02/12/2007 5:27:42 AM PST by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink
"...This is sound economics, but examine the ethical message: Mexico City will send the United States millions of its own illiterate and poor whom it will neither feed nor provide with even modest housing, but at the same time it welcomes thousands of Americans with cash to build expensive seaside second homes...

Mexico is a failed state. We are in the process of annexing it. No one dares see it, let alone say it. The culture and government of Mexico cannot provide even bare subsistence for its underclass; hence, they are sent here with a wink and a nod.

If we are going to be burdened with the Mexican underclass then we should have the rest of the country too. Not all at once, but we can buy choice parts, invest in what is viable and let the Mexican upper class (usually more Spanish than the population) drift back to Spain with their resources sold out.

4 posted on 02/12/2007 5:46:06 AM PST by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink

Wouldn't it be easier to cross from the Canadian border--it longer and less populated (at least in the middle and west of the border)?


5 posted on 02/12/2007 6:06:47 AM PST by Jedi Master Pikachu ( There are too many liberal, anti-American Wikipedians--and people in general.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

The north is still relatively less populated--and wealthier (so for your idea, that could be the area to initially focus on). Then again, it is also largely desert.


6 posted on 02/12/2007 6:08:52 AM PST by Jedi Master Pikachu ( There are too many liberal, anti-American Wikipedians--and people in general.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink; StJacques; SwinneySwitch
ping.

swinneyswitch, is your pinglist only for South Texas and the part of Mexico near Texas, or is it about South Texas and all Mexico? If the former, then sorry for the ping.

7 posted on 02/12/2007 6:10:43 AM PST by Jedi Master Pikachu ( There are too many liberal, anti-American Wikipedians--and people in general.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink
I am afraid we have lost the "real" war that needed fighting, and our President handed over the sword without a fight.
8 posted on 02/12/2007 6:11:10 AM PST by devane617 (Let's take back our country -- get a job in the MSM, or education system. We need you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

I've contended here before that the real reason the US govt insists on an open border policy is because jobs in the US act as a pressure relief valve for a dysfunctional Mexican govt. My theory is that our politicians would rather have unchecked immigration on our borders than revolution in Mexico. Frankly I think it's a stop gap measure if indeed that is the reason for open borders because, like you, I think Mexico is a failed state and revolution there is inevitable (again).


9 posted on 02/12/2007 6:12:04 AM PST by saganite (Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

"...This is sound economics, but examine the ethical message: Mexico City will send the United States millions of its own illiterate and poor whom it will neither feed nor provide with even modest housing, but at the same time it welcomes thousands of Americans with cash to build expensive seaside second homes...

Mexico is a failed state. We are in the process of annexing it. No one dares see it, let alone say it. The culture and government of Mexico cannot provide even bare subsistence for its underclass; hence, they are sent here with a wink and a nod.

If we are going to be burdened with the Mexican underclass then we should have the rest of the country too. Not all at once, but we can buy choice parts, invest in what is viable and let the Mexican upper class (usually more Spanish than the population) drift back to Spain with their resources sold out.
/////////////////////
this is not what the globalists have in mind. what they have in mind is first a north american superstate and then a new world superstate. In both cases americans move toward being ever more powerless.


10 posted on 02/12/2007 6:15:01 AM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: devane617

I agree. That's why I'm supporting Tancredo. I know there are some other good guys - like Hunter - but Tancredo was courageously fighting the fight long before it became popular to do so with some Republicans.
He's also very much in the Reagan tradition on ALL other issues: smaller government, lower taxes, strong national defense, pro-life, pro-Second Amendment, etc.

Bush seems to be anxious to reverse the 1848 Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo that ended the Mexican War in 1848!


11 posted on 02/12/2007 7:02:31 AM PST by T.L.Sink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu

You can ping me on anything related to Mexico or Texas.

Probably need a book titled "Mexas"!


12 posted on 02/12/2007 7:03:17 AM PST by SwinneySwitch (Terroristas - beyond your expectations!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: devane617
I am afraid we have lost the "real" war that needed fighting, and our President handed over the sword without a fight.

this Pres. and klintoon both failed in their duty to the Constitution in regards to the national security threat represented in article.

13 posted on 02/12/2007 7:04:13 AM PST by 1234 (HELP Chrissie Matthews get the "O-Bomb" the Democratic nomination)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 1234
I agree shares a portion of the blame, but we Repub's held the Congress, and POTUS for several years, and the problem increased exponentially. I believe the fight is over. I think GW has presided over, and handed over, the last conservative legislatures we will see. I suspect Hillary will be your next POTUS, and we all know what that means.
14 posted on 02/12/2007 7:09:24 AM PST by devane617 (Let's take back our country -- get a job in the MSM, or education system. We need you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: saganite

"the US act as a pressure relief valve for a dysfunctional Mexican govt"

Agree totally...add in the fact that we need their flow of oil which cannot be interrupted.


15 posted on 02/12/2007 7:09:52 AM PST by OregonRancher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu

I've wondered about that myself but from all I've heard Canada (with all its crazy politics) at least cooperates with us in looking for terrorists. Mexico would give bin Laden one of its maps showing the best points of entry!


16 posted on 02/12/2007 7:10:55 AM PST by T.L.Sink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MBB1984

*BUMP*!


17 posted on 02/12/2007 7:16:56 AM PST by ex-Texan (Matthew 7: 1 - 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink
Excellent article. I thought the following summed up the situtation best:

While politicians and academics assured the public that illegal aliens came here only to work and would quickly assume an American identity, the public’s own ad hoc and empirical observations of vast problems with crime, illiteracy, and illegitimacy have now been confirmed by hard data.

The problem is metastazing across the US. It comes down to whom to you believe, the elites and politicians or your own lying eyes? God help us if we have an economic downturn and the unemployment rate rises.

18 posted on 02/12/2007 7:17:43 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Mexico is a failed state. We are in the process of annexing it. No one dares see it, let alone say it. The culture and government of Mexico cannot provide even bare subsistence for its underclass; hence, they are sent here with a wink and a nod.

Its the other way around. Lifeboat America is being flooded by the poor and undeducated of Latin America. We are the ones being invaded and "annexed."

19 posted on 02/12/2007 7:20:31 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: saganite

"I've contended here before that the real reason the US govt insists on an open border policy is because jobs in the US act as a pressure relief valve for a dysfunctional Mexican govt. My theory is that our politicians would rather have unchecked immigration on our borders than revolution in Mexico. Frankly I think it's a stop gap measure if indeed that is the reason for open borders because, like you, I think Mexico is a failed state and revolution there is inevitable (again)."

I think drugs play a major part too - if we were to truly seal the border, the drug lords in the Southern Hemisphere would be incensed - there is billions of dollars at risk here. They would be prompted to act.

And, from reading about the recent travesty over the two border agents, the drug smugglers are working hand in hand with our border agents, and I'm sure a lot of politicians in Washington have their coffers filled with drug money one way or another.

I'm sure that's just a part of it, there's so many people who need the border open, and the politicans need the money from those people. That's why our borders are a joke.

Nice country we have - our government looks the other way while our borders are ignored, so companies can make more money off cheap labor, then lecture us that we're racist and bigoted when we complain that our cities are being turned into third world hellholes, and more of our taxes will go to pay for people who were'nt born here, don't belong here, and sneer at us and our culture and our laws.

It's all about $$$, whether it comes from building contractors paying off local politicians or drug profits paying off Washington. That money is more important than our rights, our safety, and our culture.

Just shut up, pay your taxes, and smile and be polite to that smirking Mexican who's leering at your daughter in the 7-11 parking lot. Ain't multiculturalism great?


20 posted on 02/12/2007 7:25:28 AM PST by ByDesign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson