Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Blame cosmic rays not CO2 for warming up the planet’
The Times ^ | February 12, 2007 | Lewis Smith

Posted on 02/11/2007 11:45:28 PM PST by MadIvan

The impact of cosmic rays on the climate could be greater than scientists suspect after experiments showed they may have a pivotal role in cloud formation.

Researchers have managed to replicate the effect of cosmic rays on the aerosols in the atmosphere that help to create clouds. Henrik Svensmark, a weather scientist in Denmark, said the experiments suggested that man’s influence on global warming might be rather less than was supposed by the bulk of scientific opinion.

Cosmic rays — radiation, or particles of energy, from stars, which bombard the Earth — can create electrically charged ions in the atmosphere that act as a magnet for water vapour, causing clouds to form.

Dr Svensmark suggests that the Sun, at a historically high level of activity, is deflecting many of the cosmic rays away from Earth and thus reducing the cloud cover.

Clouds reflect the Sun’s rays back into space and are considered to have an important cooling effect. However, if during periods of high activity the Sun’s magnetic field pushes a greater proportion of cosmic rays away from the Earth, fewer clouds will form.

The research, published in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society, concentrates on how ions are created and behave in the atmosphere when cosmic rays from stars hit it.

Cosmic rays were replicated by the use of ultraviolet light that were turned on and off in both short bursts and long exposures to create ions. The researchers found that the presence of ions encouraged the formation of clusters of molecules.

In the atmosphere these clusters of ozone, sulphur dioxide and water are understood to act as aerosols in attracting water vapour, culminating in the formation of clouds.

The number of clusters, according to the report, is proportionate to the number of ions present, which in turn depends on the frequency of cosmic rays reaching the Earth.

“The experiment indicates that ions play a role in nucleating new particles in the atmosphere and that the rate of production is sensitive to the rate of ion density,” the report concluded. “One might expect to find a relationship between ioni-sation and cloud properties. This feature seems to be consistent with the present work.”

The report added that the ions were likely to generate a reservoir of clusters of aerosol molecules in the atmosphere that “are important for nuclea-tion processes in the atmosphere and ultimately cloud formation”.

The findings are unlikely to change radically the views of mainstream climatologists. Nevertheless, a team of scientists will shortly begin a larger experiment at a particle accelerator in Europe in the hope of learning more about the effects of cosmic rays on cloud cover.

According to the Intergovern-mental Panel for Climate Change, by far the biggest influence on climate change is the level of greenhouse gases released by mankind, largely through the use of fossil fuels.

Peter Stott, of the Met Office’s Hadley Centre and one of Britain’s leading climate scientists, said that Dr Svensmark’s theory should be taken “with a cellar of salt”. Small, localised effects on cloud formation might be possible but he dismissed the suggestion of cosmic rays being responsible for global warming.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: co2; globalwarming; rays
I'd like my money back from the green taxes I've paid.

Regards, Ivan

1 posted on 02/11/2007 11:45:30 PM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mrs Ivan; odds; DCPatriot; Texican; Watery Tart; Deetes; Barset; fanfan; LadyofShalott; Tolik; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 02/11/2007 11:46:02 PM PST by MadIvan (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

STONE HIM!!! HERETIC!!!! BLASPHEMER!!!! DENIER!!!!

Sorry, I was predicting Al Gore's response.


3 posted on 02/12/2007 12:02:11 AM PST by kb2614 (Hell hath no fury than a bureaucrat scorned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
‘Blame cosmic raysTHE SUN not CO2 for warming up the planet’
4 posted on 02/12/2007 12:33:10 AM PST by verum ago (The Iranian Space Agency: set phasers to jihad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

What, Mother Britain has already instituted Green tax with respect to "climate change"?? The greeny New Zealand hasn't even started anything in real policies yet.


5 posted on 02/12/2007 2:39:36 AM PST by NZerFromHK (The US Founding is what makes Britain and USA separated by much more than a common language.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; Mrs. Don-o; RW_Whacko; honolulugal; SideoutFred; ...

FReepmail me to get on or off
Click on graphic for full GW rundown


6 posted on 02/12/2007 3:36:36 AM PST by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

More on the cosmic ray factor.

http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/Cosmic_rays_and_climate.htm


7 posted on 02/12/2007 4:04:20 AM PST by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
I thought this man made Global Warming was a "settled" issue in science.

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)

LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

8 posted on 02/12/2007 4:11:45 AM PST by LonePalm (Commander and Chef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LonePalm
I thought this man made Global Warming was a "settled" issue in science.

Only for leftist sheeple who were either born without a brain or those who have failed to develop sufficient cognitive skills to rationally analyze data. Those are the folks who tend to fall for such media driven leftist hysteria again and again......remember Y2K?

9 posted on 02/12/2007 5:27:09 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Just the facts, ma'am)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker
Sorry. I thought that was obvious.

I guess I need to add the < /sarcasm> tag more often. That was the purpose in putting "settled" in quotes.

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)

LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

10 posted on 02/12/2007 6:18:42 AM PST by LonePalm (Commander and Chef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson