"And we're supposed to jump on board with a gun grabber just on the off chance that he'll carry California?"
No, we're jumping on board with a fiscal conservative who is right on the central issue of our time (GWOT) and who can win the big industrial states that have lots of electoral votes and went for Kerry: Michigan, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Jersey, Wisconsin.
And yes, the chance that he'll carry Cali is a nice bit of icing on the cake.
If Guiliani wins California, it's a landslide. Give me 54 Electorial votes that Shillary could take in California's place.
Ohio and Florida combined wouldn't be enough. They sure as heck aren't voting for that beast in Arkansas despite her philandering husband who promptly moved to New York after leaving the White House.
At that point it's checkmate. And you know what happens as a result? We'll probably get some NON-RINO Republicans elected to the House to tip the balance back in some marginal RAT districts. And possibly get the Senate back.
And then what happens? Even assuming Guliani is the anti-Christ and wants to grab your guns (which he doesn't), no guns get grabbed. You know why? There are more than enough pro-gun Republicans in the House to block any affront on the Second Amendment and a handful of non-tretcherous RATS who protect the Second Amendment. Same goes for gay marriage. Partial birth abortions, and pretty much ever other "evil" liberal agenda y'all love railing against Guiliani for.
Everyone keeps forgetting that there's that whole Legislative branch out there that can foil an alleged Guiliani "socially liberal" agenda.
I can't see Guiliani winning California without us getting the House back as a result.
Secondly, yes, some Hollyweirdos may just close their purse strings; it has been known to happen; not all of them should she get the nod, but Hill and Bill are two very different people.
There you go again. I remember your comments on firearms about a year ago. Everything you said then was bupkis. And your statements today are no better.