Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mysterio
You honestly think hollywood and the media are going to jump ship on Hillary should she be the nominee? And we're supposed to jump on board with a gun grabber just on the off chance that he'll carry California?

If Guiliani wins California, it's a landslide. Give me 54 Electorial votes that Shillary could take in California's place.

Ohio and Florida combined wouldn't be enough. They sure as heck aren't voting for that beast in Arkansas despite her philandering husband who promptly moved to New York after leaving the White House.

At that point it's checkmate. And you know what happens as a result? We'll probably get some NON-RINO Republicans elected to the House to tip the balance back in some marginal RAT districts. And possibly get the Senate back.

And then what happens? Even assuming Guliani is the anti-Christ and wants to grab your guns (which he doesn't), no guns get grabbed. You know why? There are more than enough pro-gun Republicans in the House to block any affront on the Second Amendment and a handful of non-tretcherous RATS who protect the Second Amendment. Same goes for gay marriage. Partial birth abortions, and pretty much ever other "evil" liberal agenda y'all love railing against Guiliani for.

Everyone keeps forgetting that there's that whole Legislative branch out there that can foil an alleged Guiliani "socially liberal" agenda.

I can't see Guiliani winning California without us getting the House back as a result.

95 posted on 02/11/2007 11:14:49 PM PST by NYRepublican72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: NYRepublican72

"And you know what happens as a result? We'll probably get some NON-RINO Republicans elected to the House to tip the balance back in some marginal RAT districts. And possibly get the Senate back."


An excellent, logical post!


98 posted on 02/11/2007 11:16:58 PM PST by FairOpinion (Tell Congress: Work for Victory in Iraq. Stop Hillary. Go to: http://www.TheVanguard.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

To: NYRepublican72
I agree with your analysis. I love Newt but I don't think he could win in a "head to head" with Hillary. We lost a lot of ground in the last election. We are going to have to back up and select someone with broader appeal than, unfortunately, Newt can garner.

You are also correct on the "social conservative" issues. Immigration, gun rights, abortion, etc. are controlled by the legislature, NOT the President (as I keep having to explain). We need coat-tails--broad coat-tails! Sorry, folks, but for the time being, at least, we are going to have to suck it up and sacrifice some of our conservative personal beliefs, thanks to those who either didn't vote, or voted Dim, in the last election.
214 posted on 02/12/2007 1:43:35 AM PST by singfreedom ("Victory at all costs,.......for without victory there is no survival."--Churchill--that's "Winston")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

To: NYRepublican72

Good! If Rudy is the winner in Calif.then, i don't have to feel guilty about staying home in Tennessee. He won't take my state.


244 posted on 02/12/2007 4:03:47 AM PST by Coldwater Creek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson