The most likely answer continues to be what it was at the time Feith's working group made their presentation. From Iraq agents who passed it to Mohammed Atta in Prague.
There were working relationships between Iraq and Al Queda. Iraq, like Iran and Saudi Arabia today, worked with available resources to pursue acts against the US, its allies and its interests. Let me be careful in what I say regarding these nations and groups of influence -- they war they pursue against us is fought to provoke, to distract, to annoy -- to play to our internal weaknesses. Some times they will act as if they are on our side (and to a profit and security sense they may be at the time) while at the very same time they work with imans, islamic organizations, corrupt individuals and compromised organizations in our own nations, and certainly with the socialists in Universities, the elitists in their media and the power brokers on the beltway and finance to inculcate hate against us, ad provide money and supplies to bombers and snipers, etc.
Statement of Laurie Mylroie to the
National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States
July 9, 2003
http://www.9-11commission.gov/hearings/hearing3/witness_mylroie.htm
"Where did the anthrax come from?
The most likely answer continues to be what it was at the time Feith's working group made their presentation. From Iraq agents who passed it to Mohammed Atta in Prague."
That is a most interesting idea. I have never thought to connect that meeting(s) between Atta and the Iraqi agent with the anthrax--a very plausible connection. I had only thought it may have had something to do with the main 9/11 plot.