Indeed, the higher heats on other planets would be indicative of higher solar output.
But then again, how is it, precisely, that we measure higher temperatures from those planets? We don't have sensors on Pluto. Do we, rather, measure the reflected energy from them that we detect here? Our weakening magnetic field lets in more of the sun's energy. It also lets in more of the reflected energy from other planets.
The sensors are here, not there.
Mars: We have had satellites orbiting the planet since the mid 1990's and we have been looking at it (especially those ice caps which have been shrinking) since the time of Galileo. All point to a warming trend.
Jupiter: Again, we have been looking at it since Galileo. Jupiter because it's big and close enough and because of its very fast rotation and near 0° inclination, the clouds form nice bands across the planet, so it's relatively easy to see any changes that are going on.
Triton & Pluto: We've been observing them at least since at the 1950's for Triton & 1970's for Pluto when telescopes got powerful enough, they are small enough that when they go around the sun they will often eclipse stars and when they do this (which is often enough) we can get a good picture of what's happening in their atmospheres.
These four bodies are the only ones that we have been able to observe their atmospheres over a long period of time. It would be an awfully huge coincidence that the 4 heavenly bodies we are able to observe all just happen to be also under going global warming.
Wrong. The sun's magnetic field only effects charged particles (cosmic rays). It doesn't retard photons (light rays) in the least--so we can measure the reflected ones just fine.