Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Do Vanity Candidates Really Have a Chance? (Michael Medved)
Michael Medved's Townhall Blog ^ | February 8, 2007 | Michael Medved

Posted on 02/10/2007 2:16:42 PM PST by EveningStar

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 301-315 next last
To: EveningStar
Congressmen don't win elections.

Not in the last 126 years. And he got shot.

101 posted on 02/10/2007 3:12:20 PM PST by wireman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods
ROFL. Stop. You're killing me.

I always find it funny when the one post on the thread giving a different point of view is accused of being a result of drinking the koolaid.
102 posted on 02/10/2007 3:12:37 PM PST by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm; secretagent

Looks nice as a tag line, LOL.


103 posted on 02/10/2007 3:13:29 PM PST by donna (It's not vanity to want to influence the issues. It's good citizenship.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

"Hey, that gives me an idea...no, never mind."

yes, it would be silly to vote your convictions. There is nothing conservative about Rudy G.


104 posted on 02/10/2007 3:13:51 PM PST by Albert Barr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

I fear you are right FRiend. Their power is slapping vitriol into a keyboard.


105 posted on 02/10/2007 3:14:00 PM PST by SaxxonWoods (Boycott all Leftist Media, ignore them and they will go away...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol
Ron Paul does not support the war in Iraq. He is no better than the Dems.

I am glad you mentioned that. Your first statement is true. Your second statement is false (as I suspect you know, so I am going to let it pass as mere hyperbole).

I do support the war and I disagree with Ron Paul on the war. But I understand his position and it is a well thought out and principled position. Ron Paul opposed the war in Iraq from the beginning because he did not believe that Saddam Hussein's despotism in Iraq was the most immediate threat to the security of the United States. I would say history has been kind to his view.

I think we need to finish the job we started in Iraq. But my enthusiasm for the war diminished greatly once the mission became bringing democracy to everybody in the middle east.

106 posted on 02/10/2007 3:14:01 PM PST by trek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: trek
My 50 bucks doesn't mean anything

Period.

107 posted on 02/10/2007 3:14:04 PM PST by AmishDude (It doesn't matter whom you vote for. It matters who takes office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: GoldenPup

" but they ALL are probably more accomplished than Dan Quayle (with a couple of exceptions)."



(FROM WIKI)
In 1976, Quayle was elected to the U.S. Congress from Indiana's Fourth Congressional District, defeating an eight-term incumbent Democrat. He won reelection in 1978 by the greatest percentage margin ever achieved to that date in the northeast Indiana district. In 1980, at age 33, Quayle became the youngest person ever elected to the U.S. Senate from the State of Indiana, defeating three-term incumbent Democrat Birch Bayh. Making Indiana political history again, Quayle was reelected to the Senate in 1986 with the largest margin ever achieved to that date by a candidate in a statewide Indiana race.

During his tenure in the U.S. Senate, Quayle did legislative work in the areas of defense, arms control, labor, and human resources. He served on the Armed Services Committee, the Budget Committee, and the Labor and Human Resources Committee.


108 posted on 02/10/2007 3:14:22 PM PST by ansel12 (America, love it ,or at least give up your home citizenship before accepting ours too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: kjo

Add to that the fact that he has no and will not get any big political backing and he has yet to do anything about putting a team together. Oh yes, and he has NO chits to call in.


109 posted on 02/10/2007 3:14:27 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Celtjew Libertarian

Medved said on his show yesterday the Newt has zero chance. I actually think he's right, just because of what the media will do to him. Bush's MSM coverage would be considered positive compared to what Gingrich would receive.


110 posted on 02/10/2007 3:15:00 PM PST by boop (Now Greg, you know I don't like that WORD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
Well, gotta say; if either McCain or Giuliani becomes the Republican candidate, we (Republicans)are toast. It will be the Bob Dole campaign redux. Neither of these guys have any political sex appeal about them. They are as dull as... Dole? It's time for the GOP to turn to some young, energetic blood that has some excitement about them. But... I don't see that happening in 08. As with Dole, the GOP leadership will take the position that it's McCain's or Giuliani's "turn to run". So, that's the way it will be. And sadly, we will loose just as we did with Dole.
111 posted on 02/10/2007 3:16:51 PM PST by snoringbear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

You sound like another one of the keyboard commandos in your mom's basement who can't face the truth.


112 posted on 02/10/2007 3:17:21 PM PST by SoCalPol (Duncan Hunter '08 Tough on WOT & Illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: donna
It's not vanity to want to influence the issues. It's good citizenship.

Excellent point, and you're right. However, I don't think Medved is addressing these candidates, or saying they shouldn't run. I think he's addressing the voters who think these candidates actually can win.

113 posted on 02/10/2007 3:17:22 PM PST by EveningStar (Hillary Clinton is Hugo Chavez in a pantsuit - P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

Projecting?


114 posted on 02/10/2007 3:18:09 PM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Warren G Harding was an amiable, lazy, manipulable Senator who got the nomination in the famous 'smoky backroom'. He would be a vanity candidate today, too, but he won.

IOW, don't knock the vanities. That's what the campaign trail is designed to test. The fact that it's starting this soon is what's sickening.


115 posted on 02/10/2007 3:18:30 PM PST by gcruse (http://garycruse.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Yeh, and in 04 Dean was annointed by the media to be the next Dem nominee.

How did that turn out?

===

Any of the 'lesser' candidates could emerge.

Heck, Obama became a household name overnight. Talk about a lesser who became a frontrunner! Obama has 2 years of Senate experience. Even Edwards had a full Senate term, and Hillary a full plus re-election to a second.

Come to think of it, all three of them could be considered 'lessers', yet they are the presumptive frontrunners on the Dem side.


116 posted on 02/10/2007 3:18:50 PM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pollyannaish

Hi! Yep, here I am getting in trouble again. There sure are a lot of people here who take themselves waaayyyyy too seriously!


117 posted on 02/10/2007 3:19:00 PM PST by SaxxonWoods (Boycott all Leftist Media, ignore them and they will go away...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

So what does that have to do with me?


118 posted on 02/10/2007 3:19:19 PM PST by uptoolate (If it sounds absurd, 51% chance it was sarcasm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm

Right now I'm dedicating myself to fighting the left wing of the Republican party. Later on I'll worry about Hillary and her bunch.

Top priority... take down Rudy Guilianni.


119 posted on 02/10/2007 3:19:35 PM PST by upsdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Did you read the article? Your comments indicate that you did not.


120 posted on 02/10/2007 3:21:03 PM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 301-315 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson