Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheeOhioInfidel
From article:Ramos and Compean testified they made a point of looking at the suspect's hands and saw no weapon. Compean fired at least 14 rounds and Ramos fired once.

Who is the Reubin Navarette guy who wrote this article? From everything else I have read this statement is a lie. All the articles I have read said they thought they saw him with a gun in his hand. Besides who believes that a drug runner would be running drugs without carring a wheapon? NOT ME!

25 posted on 02/10/2007 2:52:36 PM PST by Spunky ("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Spunky

Ruben is doing the same thing the prosecutors have been doing--using detailed small facts to paint a story that is not true.


It's like saying "a driver was sitting in his automobile with his hands on the wheel and then the highway patrol officer shot him," leaving out the actions in between where said driver pulls out gun and shoots at the officer.


57 posted on 02/10/2007 4:43:27 PM PST by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Spunky

There have been multiple statements made by the two agents. Those statements have not always been consistant. Their current story is that they saw weapons. One of the agents brought up seeing a weapon at a hearing to get his job back, can't remember which, but I think it was Compean.


92 posted on 02/11/2007 8:17:55 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson