Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Bother Electing Pro-Gun, Pro-Family Candidates Anywhere? (The Rudophile Philosophy)
Free Republic - TitansAFC ^ | 2-10-07 | TitansAFC

Posted on 02/10/2007 1:39:11 PM PST by TitansAFC

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 261-266 next last
To: TitansAFC

'"Roberts and Alito!" -- Oh yes! Problem solved; all questions answered! Whatever were we concerned about in the first place?"

Rudy is shrewd. He remembers how President Bush said that he would pick judges, like Scalia and Thomas, which was probably the deciding factor in Bush's winning the election, so Rudy is playing the same kind of politics, and too many naive types are falling for it.


101 posted on 02/10/2007 4:58:47 PM PST by Sun (Let your New Year's resolution be to vote for conservatives in the primaries! Happy 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
you SAID:
You could pull Barry Goldwater hisself out of the grave and dress him up in a modern suit and he'd be thrown out of the race at the first mention of personal responsibility.

102 posted on 02/10/2007 5:01:35 PM PST by narses ("Freedom is about authority." - Rudolph Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Hildy; TitansAFC

"Vote for whomever you damn well please...but don't you DARE come back on FreeRepublic in 2009 bemoaning the state of the Country.
Let me ask you what precisely you are doing to forward your choice for Presidential nominee? Hmm...

When the 2008 election happen, you know damn well you will push the lever for the guy with the R next to his name because the person with the D is 1000 times more dangerous. So if you think you can get the person you want nominated, GO AHEAD...get off the computer and start doing something. Ranting on FreeRepublic ain't gonna get it done, Buddy,"

NEWSFLASH Hildy,
Did you know that the primaries haven't taken place yet, and there's still time to get a CONSERVATIVE Republican for the president's race?

Hope I helped.


103 posted on 02/10/2007 5:01:38 PM PST by Sun (Let your New Year's resolution be to vote for conservatives in the primaries! Happy 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: narses; lilylangtree; sitetest
Try saying anything positive.

I will be glad to support your pro-gun, pro-life, AuH20 protege in the primaries, and I will vote for them in the general election against Hillary or Oboama, etc.....if you'll tell me who that is.

See? I can support your preferred candidate against the Dems.

Do you see the difference between us?

We can't seem to provide you with anyone acceptable, so all you have to do is get us a better option. The ball's in y'alls' court.

104 posted on 02/10/2007 5:04:51 PM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

A few years ago I was hoping we could eliminate the liberal democrat party, sadly at this point, it looks like the conservative republican party will be eliminated.


105 posted on 02/10/2007 5:05:13 PM PST by stevio (Rudy? Don't make me puke.(NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

"Do you see the difference between us?"

Yes. You value winning over principle. I do not.


106 posted on 02/10/2007 5:07:34 PM PST by narses ("Freedom is about authority." - Rudolph Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: narses; lilylangtree
you SAID:

Yes. I did. You said you wanted a true conservative. I give you AuH20. How can you possibly have anyone more conservative that Barry Goldwater?

If a black, woman Barry Goldwater twin sister were alive today, would you or would you not support her? I would. And yet, I think when you look at the decay in America, and the gimme-gimme Katrina attitude in such a large part of even Red State America, that such a Trueblu Conservative would be labeled an "Aunt Jemima/uncle Tom sellout" and would absolutely set the record for landslide loss in America today.

These United States nearly elected psychotic Kerry and Algore by the slimmest of margins! For God's sake, it is not 1964 nor 1980 anymore!

107 posted on 02/10/2007 5:12:26 PM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

Comment #108 Removed by Moderator

To: sam_paine

Dear sam_paine,

"...if you'll tell me who that is."

There are many Republicans for whom I'd vote with at least some happiness, and others for whom I'd even hold my nose and vote.

Some of these folks suffered in 2006, and may not recover for a run for the presidency. Others seem uninterested. Others are running.

I'd vote for Duncan Hunter.

Or Mike Huckabee.

Or Bill Owens.

Or Tommy Thompson.

Or John McCain (with great reluctance).

Or Haley Barbour.

Or, if they could recover, George Allen or Rick Santorum.

Or heck, if we were stupid enough to nominate another Bush boy, I'd even vote for Jeb Bush.

It's unlikely that I'd vote for Mr. Romney. At this point, I judge him a phony. However, I'm open to the possibility that he may persuade me otherwise.

Mr. Giuliani is about the only one that is pretty much completely unacceptable to me.

And even that could change.

If he wore sackcloth and ashes, and walked down Broadway, loudly wailing and lamenting his previous crimes, and tearing his garments and his hair (what little there is to tear), flailing at himself with a nice cat o' nine tails, proclaiming his repentance and conversion on important issues like life, and the right to bear arms, and preserving the traditional family, if he dumped his current floozy, Ms. Nathan, understanding that as a Catholic, he is in a continuing adulterous relationship, then I'd give it some thought.

If you have other Republicans to mention, I'll tell you what I think about them.


sitetest


109 posted on 02/10/2007 5:14:14 PM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: sitetest; sam_paine

What he said! (Well said at that!)


110 posted on 02/10/2007 5:15:21 PM PST by narses ("Freedom is about authority." - Rudolph Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: narses
Yes. You value winning over principle. I do not.

Fine. You're superior to me. Okay. Lead us.

Who do you want that will satisfy you, so that you can use my vote to push for pro-life conservative principles and make sure that we don't become the USSA with Hitlery as the Commisar in 2008. Just tell me who to vote for in the primary. [ Listening. ]

111 posted on 02/10/2007 5:15:34 PM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

See 109


112 posted on 02/10/2007 5:16:07 PM PST by narses ("Freedom is about authority." - Rudolph Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Rudy may cause more harm to the Second Amendment than Hillary, since the Republicans in Congress and the Senate would actually stand up to Hillary.

These are my thoughts too. I'm tired of being bled to death from a thousand paper cuts by our so-called friends. As much as I want to deny her that honor, it may be the only way.

113 posted on 02/10/2007 5:17:40 PM PST by stevio (Rudy? Don't make me puke.(NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
Beautiful!

This is where the battle shall be fought.

Don't fork the choice over to the MSM of whom we should choose as our nominee!

(Not so dirty little secret is they are voting for the Dem no matter what!)

114 posted on 02/10/2007 5:20:05 PM PST by right way right (bummer. It's almost as bad as being born in a manger. You gotta start somewhere.( www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

Dear sam_paine,

Oh yeah, I'd also vote for these guys, too:

Sen. Brownback, Rep. Tancredo, Rep. Paul, and Gov. Gilmore.

If you know of anyone else considering running, let me know, I'll tell you whether or not I'd vote for them.


sitetest


115 posted on 02/10/2007 5:23:21 PM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: sitetest; narses
If he wore sackcloth and ashes, and walked down Broadway, loudly wailing and lamenting his previous crimes,...etcetc

Which, of course, he would of course have to do in any case since he is a popular former Mayor in the most liberal city on earth, so he's got some things that make him popular with "eeeevil" people, thus he smells to high heaven tored staters, just because! [Neew York Sitteee!?! Gitarope!]

I'm fine with any of those that you've got in your list, like I told Narses, I'm an ABH.

Look down on me all you want, but I have one principle, and that is that this country cannot be handed over to an open Marxist like Hillary, because it can NEVER be undone, and it undermines the hopes for every other fiscal and socially conservative principle for the rest of my life and most of our kids'. That is my one principle that narses won't give me any credit for.

BTW I still can't understand what anyone ever saw in Geo Allen. I had heard so much hype about him and then I heard him on MTP or something, and I thought, "Good Lord what an uninspiring milquestoast muddle-feet." Sure nuff, he got taken out by the wit of a college kid.

116 posted on 02/10/2007 5:27:16 PM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

sitetest named a number of conservatives but none are running. so how can anyone recommend a person to you that's not running. the basic idea is that presently we're being limited to John, Mitt or Rudy who do not represent conservative ideas. also, if you'll recall, Barry Goldwater turned liberal in his later years.


117 posted on 02/10/2007 5:28:05 PM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Sun

Oh yea, Bush also said he would institute tort reform, fix S.S., NO amnesty, etc., etc., etc.. Like we're going to fall for what a liberal politician promises us.


118 posted on 02/10/2007 5:28:28 PM PST by stevio (Rudy? Don't make me puke.(NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
Good post
Pay no attention to the Rudybots.
119 posted on 02/10/2007 5:28:30 PM PST by WKB (This Baptist would vote for a Mormon before he'd vote for a moron AGAIN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: narses
"See 109" [by sitetest]

Yes sitetest does have great positive things to say, doesn't he?

Still waiting on same from you.

120 posted on 02/10/2007 5:30:21 PM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 261-266 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson