To: Nevernow
Which is another thing that worries me, since if you've already got one of the strains the vaccine protects against, it can make it worse
Interesting. Might that not be the reason why they chose 9-years old girls
An anti-STD vaccine is a sexual issue, no matter how a company tries to spin it.
I would disagree, it's a public health issue, because 60% of the female population has this HPV-thing. It's for protection. Why would that be a sexual issue? Do you think a 9-year old girl will think: A hah, now that I can't get cancer, I'm going to....
Of course not!
73 posted on
02/09/2007 2:49:17 PM PST by
LtdGovt
("Where government moves in, community retreats and civil society disintegrates" -Janice Rogers Brown)
To: LtdGovt
I already said that's why they're doing it, but there are fifth and sixth graders that have sex.
Once more. It's against an STD. A SEXually transmitted disease.
It's got sex in the word.
How is something against a sexually transmitted disease not sexual?
60% of boys have it too, so why aren't boys being vaccinated? They spread it. They can get hurt by it.
I don't think a 9 year old is going to say that. I think 13+ girls are going to say, well I had this vaccine so I'm safe.
If it's against an STD, it's a sexual issue.
77 posted on
02/09/2007 2:58:47 PM PST by
Nevernow
(No one has the right to choose to do what is wrong.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson