To: LtdGovt
I already said that's why they're doing it, but there are fifth and sixth graders that have sex.
Once more. It's against an STD. A SEXually transmitted disease.
It's got sex in the word.
How is something against a sexually transmitted disease not sexual?
60% of boys have it too, so why aren't boys being vaccinated? They spread it. They can get hurt by it.
I don't think a 9 year old is going to say that. I think 13+ girls are going to say, well I had this vaccine so I'm safe.
If it's against an STD, it's a sexual issue.
77 posted on
02/09/2007 2:58:47 PM PST by
Nevernow
(No one has the right to choose to do what is wrong.)
To: Nevernow
60% of boys have it too, so why aren't boys being vaccinated? They spread it. They can get hurt by it.
The political correctness of this nonsense is just unbelievable. Why should boys get vaccinated? They are not the ones getting cancer because of this. Furthermore, think of this in economic terms. A boy has less incentive to take a vaccine, because (almost) nothing can happen to him anyway. Then, girls might get hurt. Very politically correct, but idiotic (no disrespect).
I don't think a 9 year old is going to say that. I think 13+ girls are going to say, well I had this vaccine so I'm safe.
Okay, so it's better to keep the HPV and the cancer that might result from it as a potential punishment for having sex?
82 posted on
02/09/2007 3:07:48 PM PST by
LtdGovt
("Where government moves in, community retreats and civil society disintegrates" -Janice Rogers Brown)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson