Sorry, no room for the BARF alert in the title line
1 posted on
02/09/2007 11:14:42 AM PST by
Lorianne
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: Lorianne
And there point is....? That voting for Bush is hazardous to the wellbeing of children? Gag me.
2 posted on
02/09/2007 11:16:37 AM PST by
My2Cents
("I support the right-ward most candidate who has a legitimate chance to win." -- W.F. Buckley)
To: Lorianne
Blue states tend to tax themselves at significantly higher levels, which makes it possible to reach more children and families with beneficial health, social and education programs. Red states overwhelmingly are home to decades-long adherence to anti-government and anti-tax ideology that often runs directly contrary to the needs of healthy children and stable families.
translation: we must raise little socialists instead of those coming up in households that believe in the individual..
3 posted on
02/09/2007 11:17:28 AM PST by
GeorgiaDawg32
(I'm a Patriot Guard Rider.....www.patriotguard.org for info..)
To: Lorianne
4 posted on
02/09/2007 11:17:29 AM PST by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
To: Lil'freeper
5 posted on
02/09/2007 11:17:33 AM PST by
big'ol_freeper
(It looks like one of those days when one nuke is just not enough-- Lt. Col. Mitchell, SG-1)
To: Lorianne
A brilliant attack by the culture which is driving Hillary Clinton's campaign. Really brilliant. Undermine the confidence of all those red state moms and get them to vote for Hillary.
How dare people be anti-big government and anti-tax? What a crime.
6 posted on
02/09/2007 11:17:55 AM PST by
rjp2005
(Lord have mercy on us)
To: Lorianne
We noticed you are at risk. We're the government, and we're here to help. /s
7 posted on
02/09/2007 11:18:08 AM PST by
rbookward
(When 900 years old you are, type as well you will not!)
To: Lorianne
To: Lorianne
All that may be true, but Red-State children are less likely to be shot-up in school, or killed by drug gangs, or hooked on heroin, or OBESE, or blown up by terrorists ...
... you get the idea ...
.
9 posted on
02/09/2007 11:18:48 AM PST by
Westbrook
(Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it!)
To: Lorianne
Research indicates that the average size of the male penis is significantly smaller in Blue States than in Red States. Wonder why that would be???
10 posted on
02/09/2007 11:19:52 AM PST by
RVN Airplane Driver
("To be born into freedom is an accident; to die in freedom is an obligation..)
To: Lorianne
All 10 of the bottom states of this measure are red states. Proabably driven by liberal tolerance of social pathologies in the "blue" parts of those "red" states - like New Orleans, Atlanta, Miami, and Dallas.
13 posted on
02/09/2007 11:22:20 AM PST by
Mr. Jeeves
("When the government is invasive, the people are wanting." -- Tao Te Ching)
To: Lorianne
Checked out their website...briefly.Saw the Children's Defense Fund mentioned as one of their "sister' organizations.I now know everything about them that I need to know because,as my Mom taught me as a kid...."you're know by the company you keep".
15 posted on
02/09/2007 11:23:23 AM PST by
Gay State Conservative
("The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism."-Karl Marx)
To: Lorianne
I'm surprised the article didn't mention gun ownership rates in "red" states.
high gun ownership = children in poverty
Reminds me of this organization that puts up billboards in New Mexico that imply that weapons research at the labs (Los Alamos and Sandia) is causing poverty in New Mexico.
www.lasg.org
To: Lorianne
No wonder the liberal media is tanking.
19 posted on
02/09/2007 11:24:05 AM PST by
EagleUSA
To: Lorianne
The bottom line here is that where a child lives can be a major factor in that youths ability to survive and thrive in America. The reason why this is the case is no mystery: Blue states tend to tax themselves at significantly higher levels, which makes it possible to reach more children and families with beneficial health, social and education programs. Red states overwhelmingly are home to decades-long adherence to anti-government and anti-tax ideology that often runs directly contrary to the needs of healthy children and stable families. But this guy doesn't have an agenda. Surely not.
23 posted on
02/09/2007 11:27:51 AM PST by
Pete
To: Lorianne
Homeland Insecurity
American Children at Risk outlines a $500 billion Invest in Kids agenda to reverse the harmful impact of conservative ideology on children... In other words, the author is calling upon the powers that be to force servitude upon those reckless red-staters who are neglecting and abusing their children.
This book is dangerous in that it represents an early and beginning effort to demonizing a fellow countrymen based upon ideology. The book also appears to recommend punitive action on those who do not share the "blue state" philosophy.
This book is the new "Animal Farm" book.
24 posted on
02/09/2007 11:28:53 AM PST by
Obadiah
To: Lorianne
Polypragmonocracy on the march.
26 posted on
02/09/2007 11:30:33 AM PST by
ctdonath2
(The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
To: Lorianne
The real difference here is that the top states are extremely white, and the bottom ones are very "minority".
There is a huge difference in black vs white infant mortality for instance, and this cuts across regional lines. This is a cultural problem as well, and not directly related to poverty, as Hispanic populations in the US do very well on infant mortality (matching whites) in spite of being just as poor as blacks.
Any state with a high black population will look bad in a study like this.
28 posted on
02/09/2007 11:31:53 AM PST by
buwaya
To: Lorianne
Wyoming, Georgia, Arkansas, Alabama, South Carolina, Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Louisiana and, in last place, Mississippi). Yeah, all the states that are on the frontlines of the illegal immigration hordes.
29 posted on
02/09/2007 11:34:02 AM PST by
VeniVidiVici
(Celebrate Monocacy!)
To: Lorianne
You've got to be kidding. I live in a so-called "Blue" State and we have a public high school graduation rate of 61% that is
dropping every year. So that means that right now, 39% of the 'children' who attended public school are now left behind.
39% of the eventual adult population who have the equivalent of a sixth grade education (if that) is not good news, long-term, for this so-called "Blue" state!
No wonder Hillary wants to control everybody. At this rate, she can and she will.
32 posted on
02/09/2007 11:35:17 AM PST by
pray4liberty
(http://totallyunjust.tripod.com)
To: Lorianne
My inital reaction to this is what a load of bullsh*t!
34 posted on
02/09/2007 11:38:15 AM PST by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson