Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I do not recall a big linkage being made between Saddam and Al Qaeda...some of a link, but not a major one. Is my recollection faulty?
1 posted on 02/09/2007 6:19:47 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: SoFloFreeper

bump


68 posted on 02/09/2007 8:18:47 AM PST by patj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper; Peach; jveritas

In my opinion, the link was stronger than most will admit.


71 posted on 02/09/2007 8:33:40 AM PST by MizSterious (Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper
Just another LIE from the left....the report didn't state that....How dare you question our intelligence
72 posted on 02/09/2007 8:35:09 AM PST by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper
The Saddam-Al Qaeda link was PLAYED up by the socialist left. What they did was accuse [FALSELY] the POTUS and his administration of SAYING there was a link, which they never did but by their constant shrill protestations they set up a straw man argument that eventually became accepted as truth.

President Bush NEVER said there was a link anymore than he said Saddam had a hand in 911.

What was said and is still true is that Saddam AIDED and ABETTED terrorism, was hiding WMD and was seeking Nuke capability and that POST 911 we as a NATION could NO LONGER look the other way as Saddam systematically violated every UN resolution, for 12 LONG YEARS, WHICH required PROOF that he disposed of all his WMD.

80 posted on 02/09/2007 8:49:35 AM PST by PISANO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper
"A "very damning" report by the Defense Department's inspector general depicts a Pentagon that purposely manipulated intelligence in an effort to link Saddam Hussein to al-Qaida..."

If only they'd sent Joe Wilson to Iraq after he cleared up all the questions about Nigeria...
He already had the script and could have set us straight over the week end.

(Sarcasm alert probably not necessary)

83 posted on 02/09/2007 8:58:13 AM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Misleading title -- looks like the Dems twisted the words in the report.


84 posted on 02/09/2007 9:05:25 AM PST by IntelliQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

I have no problem with the decision to use military force to oust Saddam Hussein.

1.) There were known, notorious terrorists living in Iraq under the protection and with the knowledge of the Hussein Regime. People like Abu Nidal and Abbu Abbas, both of whom were directly-DIRECTLY-responsible for the cold-blooded murder of Americans.

2.) The Hussein Regime was openly paying money and providing explosive vests to suicide bombers in the West Bank.

3.) They violated the terms of the cease-fire.

4.) They were firing at our planes constantly.

5.) They possessed and had used NBC weaponry on their foes and their own citizens. Only the stupidest of dumbasses think that somehow they used up their entire supply on the Iranians and the Kurds. Yeah, that's the ticket.

In law enforcement parlance...they had the means, the motive and the ability to provide anything from explosives, money and haven all the way to NBC weaponry to terrorists.

As much as liberals would like us all to forget 9/11, we are not going to do so. It was a watershed event.

In a post 9/11 world, I am gratified the President was not going to wait around for Saddam Hussein to get fed up enough with the status quo to finally get lucky and shoot down one of our planes and parade the pilot through the street while we wrung our hands like the idiot liberals would do.

Or worse, just sit around whining, sending dumbass threatening letters, wringing our hands or prodding the UN to do something other than get fat on Oil For Food money and rape children, while the Hussein Regime started funding terrorists and giving them the means and materials to carry out attacks on America. That includes chemical or biological weapons.


85 posted on 02/09/2007 9:07:39 AM PST by rlmorel (Islamofacism: It is all fun and games until someone puts an eye out. Or chops off a head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Gotta keep this one...


87 posted on 02/09/2007 9:08:14 AM PST by Edgerunner (Better RED state than DEAD state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Amazingly enough, even the Washington Post article is fairer, than this one in the SFC. This is more like the Democrats are trying to make a mountain out of something less than a molehill.


Probe: Prewar intel inappropriate but not illegal
Pentagon report says ex-policy chief gave 'dubious' info to White House

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17051786/


Intelligence provided by former undersecretary of defense Douglas J. Feith to buttress the White House case for invading Iraq included "reporting of dubious quality or reliability" that supported the political views of senior administration officials rather than the conclusions of the intelligence community, according to a report by the Pentagon's inspector general.

In a telephone interview Thursday, Feith emphasized the inspector general's conclusion that his actions, described in the report as "inappropriate," were not unlawful. "This was not 'alternative intelligence assessment,' " he said. "It was from the start a criticism of the consensus of the intelligence community, and in presenting it I was not endorsing its substance."

In interviews with Pentagon investigators, the summary document said, Feith insisted that his activities did not constitute intelligence and that "even if they were, [they] would be appropriate given that they were responding to direction from the Deputy Secretary of Defense."




88 posted on 02/09/2007 9:15:10 AM PST by IntelliQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

90 posted on 02/09/2007 9:19:26 AM PST by IntelliQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

"a damning defense department report which is very disturbing......"


it seems that only when mr. levin and his minions are in power, and directing all of the activities of humankind, will there be no disturbing reports, no corrupt administrations, no hunger, no strife, no racism, no unhappiness, no war, no hatred.....the sun will shine again and maybe mr. levin will have his glasses un-welded from his nose and he will stop trying to resemble karl marx.


91 posted on 02/09/2007 9:19:57 AM PST by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Yawn !


93 posted on 02/09/2007 9:24:40 AM PST by IrishMike ("Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events.Small minds discuss people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sageb1

bookmark


96 posted on 02/09/2007 9:30:11 AM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper
A "very damning" report ... says ... Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich

There you go, that's all that needs to be known. Now that the Democrats are in power they're going to do what they can to make it appear that their baseless accusations were right all along, while really all they're doing is tossing out the same slander, but this time with titles of authority next to their names.

Unfortunately, their allies at SFGate now present Levin's opinion of a report as if it's gospel truth.

100 posted on 02/09/2007 9:51:56 AM PST by MitchellC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper
"Is my recollection faulty?"

Nope, you're spot on. It has been driving me up a wall with WHOEVER is trying to revise history these last few years -- Republican or Democrat. I paid rapt attention to everything Bush said right after 9-11. I didn't get it wrong. He never said there was, in fact, he said there was no provable link between Saddam and 9-11, but there were links to Al Qaida in Iraq, i.e. funding, terrorist training, etc. He said if we opened the ball on this situation, it would be long and hard and take many years. He also said he couldn't 100% confirm there were WMDs, but was struggling with whether or not to go in and bust the place up because of strong suspicion.

I remember when he announced we were going in, and I thought to myself, "Well, I guess we'll find out for sure one way or the other." I sighed a deep sigh and because I had a son who was a year too young to enlist (and I was sure he would) there was no rush to go on my part, but I knew we had to know what the ME had and how they intended to use it. This is all so aggravating, I can't stand it AND I'm irritated as heck that Bush won't step up and blast -- I would -- and I think somebody needs to pin these traitors hides to the wall but GOOD! This is just out and out wrong!
107 posted on 02/09/2007 10:20:39 AM PST by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper
The thing that strikes me is that the IG is an accountant whose job it is to look for financial waste, fraud and abuse.

Is this even in his job description?

114 posted on 02/09/2007 11:45:55 AM PST by Smedley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper
"I do not recall a big linkage being made between Saddam and Al Qaeda...some of a link, but not a major one. Is my recollection faulty?"

Consider the source.

SF Gate is part of the San Francisco Chronicle, a left wing rag commonly known locally as "The San Francisco Koranicle". Discount 90% of what that fishwrap prints.

116 posted on 02/10/2007 3:13:36 PM PST by albee (Okay. so he missed aThe best thing you can do for the poor is.....not be one of them. - Eric Hoffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson