To fail to vote for the GOP nominee in 2008 is voting for Anti-self-defense, pro-abortion, pro-pervert, pro-tax-and-spend.No offense, but voting for Rudy is voting for all but the last... and the GOP itself has pretty much been pro-spendspendspend
I understand the shortcomings our party is dealing with. In November though you have a choice between two and only two. The democratic candidate, in every case, will be worse on those issues than the GOP candidate.
I like Duncan Hunter. I will work for Duncan Hunter.
If he wins the GOP primary. I will vote FOR Duncan Hunter in the General election. I will vote for the Republican Nominee in the General Election because in every case that person will deliver less of the socially depraved crap than the Democratic nominee.
My reference for this continues to be the likes of Daniel, Shadrack, Mishak and Abednego in the old testiment serving under a Pagan King.
I've already said I'll vote for Rudy if he is the candidate. And he runs on the right issues (the War and government reform).
But I disagree that a Democrat will be worse than a RINO. President Bush, even without the war, is a more profligate spender than Clinton ever was. He hasn't used his veto to try to curb Congress's spending even once.