Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yatros from flatwater

Um, I really hate to point out the obvious, but -- hellooo? -- a "mosque" on the "Temple Mount"?

We have all figured out, by now, that these 7th century holdovers aren't the shar, er, uh, they're not the brightest bulbs in the marquee. So, that oughta explain why they went and put a mosque on the Temple Mount, in spite of the fact that EVERYONE (except them, obviously) knew perfectly well that a "Temple Mount" is for [drumroll] A TEMPLE.

Seeing the truth in 20/20 hindsight has really gotta hurt, so it's no wonder they're so danged testy about their centuries-old boo-boo.


13 posted on 02/08/2007 11:03:31 AM PST by HKMk23 (No view is admirable or infernal but that the root principle makes it so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: HKMk23
Let's not forget...
They didn't really "put" a mosque on the temple mount..
They took possession of a Byzantine Church and converted it into a mosque..
14 posted on 02/08/2007 6:25:19 PM PST by Drammach ("If you make yourselves sheep, the wolves will eat you." -- Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson