To: EternalVigilance
Anyone who wants a leftist like Giuliani anywhere near that sort of power can only be one of two things: a leftist themselves, or incredibly ignorant.You may well be right... but the argument about Guiliani's alleged general leftism is way outside the scope of this thread, which is about Guiliani's stance on gun control. Anyone who wants a person who favors gun control anywhere near the Presidency can be only one of three tings: a leftist, incredibly ignorant, or cognizant of the system of checks and balances and capable of weighing competing interests.
623 posted on
02/07/2007 6:10:47 PM PST by
Politicalities
(http://www.politicalities.com)
To: Politicalities
or cognizant of the system of checks and balances and capable of weighing competing interests. Something you have displayed serious ignorance about, so why should we listen to you?
625 posted on
02/07/2007 6:11:38 PM PST by
dirtboy
(Duncan Hunter 08)
To: Politicalities
cognizant of the system of checks and balances and capable of weighing competing interests.Let's count them up: the SCOTUS is 5-4 anti-second amendment. The Pelosi-Reid Cngress is anti-Second Amendment. President Rudy would make it a trifecta in opposition to the Second Amendment. That's all three branches.
Not a whole hell of a lot of checks and balances there, my confused friend.
To: Politicalities
or cognizant of the system of checks and balances and capable of weighing competing interests. In context, that comment marks you as a deceiver.
650 posted on
02/07/2007 6:34:19 PM PST by
EternalVigilance
("With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson