Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Diddle E. Squat
If gun control was the only issue, then yes, you might be correct. But even then, a gun owner (and in reality everyone) is better off with the candidate who would be ok with a few more restrictions than the candidate that would actively pursue far, far more.

I agree entirely.

Since Rudy has actively promoted gun control laws, that is why he should not be the GOP nominee.

Thanks for making my point for me better than I was making it myself.

467 posted on 02/07/2007 5:14:23 PM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 444 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy

Actually my point was about electibility, which is why you quoted me out of context.


497 posted on 02/07/2007 5:22:53 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat (Rudy Giuliani-Fred Thompson in '08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 467 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy
Since Rudy has actively promoted gun control laws, that is why he should not be the GOP nominee.

************

It's actually quite simple, isn't it?

1,003 posted on 02/08/2007 6:16:54 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 467 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson