Posted on 02/07/2007 8:52:37 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Shades of Jimmy Carter.
Yeah, they only want to take your money "for your own safety".
Enforcing a fifteen MPH difference in speed, between heavy trucks and all other traffic, is going to significantly increase fatalities on that stretch of interstate. It's known as "friction," in DOT parlance, and friction is bad.
Didn't know what it was called but I thought the same thing.
Well, the auto speed limit drops to 65 as well, but it's not as though many motorists will pay attention or anything like that.
A cousin of mine is an engineer for the NC state DOT, and I've learned a couple of interesting phrases and concepts regarding traffic from him. The stop-and-go that lasts for hours after an accident is the "slinky effect," for instance.
Great.............this is a good idea. Everyone knows that those big trucks get better mileage at the higher speeds. Surely don't want this to happen. Bunch of jerks.
I've heard it called "platoon friction", assuming it's the same thing. You're right, this is crazy.
Where do they get these ideas?
Speed differential kills. Watermelons don't care, it's about control, not safety.
"The stop-and-go that lasts for hours after an accident is the "slinky effect," for instance"
Interesting, thanks.
Of course he and Algore balanced that one act off with a mountain of GovernMental EnvironMentalism through Gore's "Reinventing Government" treachery!!!
Now we have Bruce Babbit's bogus left-hand-man as our Lt. Governor all teamed up with our dazzlingdumshit "Republican" GANG-GREEN Governerd... Arnold Schwartzenfrauder!!!
"Watermelons don't care, it's about control, not safety."
I've often thought supposed environmental concerns were cover for opposition to individual mobility. Watermelons, lol ... green on the outside, but red through and through.
I'm not flying off the handle, just observing that enforcing different speed limits for heavy trucks and all other traffic is going to increase fatalities. I hate ridiculously low speed limits on highways designed to be safe at much higher speeds, but that county would be better off with 55 MPH for all traffic on that stretch of interstate for safety reasons.
TDOT lowers I-26, I-81 speed limits in Sullivan
The speed limit on interstate highways in Sullivan County is about to drop to 55 mph for trucks and 65 mph for all other vehicles, according to a press release issued by the Tennessee Department of Transportation.
It's supposed to make the air cleaner and help Sullivan County meet federal environmental guidelines.
The Sullivan County Commission voted last May to ask TDOT to lower the speed limit for trucks to 10 mph less than the speed limit for other vehicles.
A statement issued Wednesday by TDOT says signs with the new speed limits will begin to be posted next week.
According to TDOT:
The Kingsport Metropolitan Planning Organization asked the County Commission to seek the speed limit change from TDOT. The goal: reduce vehicle emissions, thereby improving air quality, with the goal of bringing Sullivan County into attainment with the Environmental Protection Agency's federal air quality health standard for ozone. Sullivan County and portions of the East Tennessee Valley are currently categorized by the EPA as non-attainment areas.
"County governments are looking at ways to improve air quality to meet EPA standards," said TDOT Chief of Environment and Planning Ed Cole. "A study conducted by the Federal Highway Administration shows that reducing truck speed limits by 10 miles per hour can reduce the nitrogen oxide emission factor by approximately 18 percent or more per truck. If we get reductions anywhere close to that level it will be worth it."
"According to studies by the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation's Division of Air Pollution Control, reduction of interstate truck speed limits is among the most effective measures we can take to assure the Tri-Cities attains and maintains attainment with the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for ground-level ozone," said Bill Sorah, chairman of the Ozone Action Partnership for Northeast Tennessee. "This action fits in with our Early Action Compact with EPA, which has allowed our counties to avoid classification as non-attainment. Non-attainment is a label we want to avoid. Not only would it mean our air quality does not meet the standards, but it would also create an impediment to economic development."
A Federal Highway Administration analysis of reduced truck speeds and its effect on emission rates can be found in the TDOT media room at www.tn.gov/tdot/mediaroom/docs/2005/emission_reductions.pdf.
Before they voted on the issue last year, county commissioners were told it might mean more cars hitting more trucks. But it might mean fewer trucks hitting cars.
Proponents of the proposal, speaking on behalf of the Ozone Action Partnership, said transportation officials think making trucks go 10 mph slower than cars would be "a wash" on safety because it will mean "more car onto truck, but less truck onto car and less sideswipes."
Supporters also said better air quality could help promote economic development in the county.
County Commissioner Joe Herron said the county's status as a non-attainment area for ground-level ozone had kept some businesses from locating here in recent months.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.