Dan Rather - the gift that keeps giving.
We still need to design those honorary Rathergate pajamas.
Posted on 02/06/2007 4:37:21 PM PST by Polybius
The Web is a great way to deliver information, but it's also a great way to expose, spread, or jump-start a scandal.
SNIP
The Net's biggest scandals are nothing if not democratic, touching everyone from the most ordinary individuals to the highest office in the land. Not everyone deserved the notoriety. Some were hapless victims of privacy breaches; others were exposed by hackers or misguided crusaders. But in almost every case, somebody ended up getting fired, sued, or mortally embarrassed.
SNIP
3. Dan Rather Bids a Font Farewell
They were supposed to be the smoking gun the Bush Administration was desperate to conceal: four documents, dating from the early 1970s, that allegedly proved that powerful friends of our current president pulled strings to keep him out of Vietnam and put him into the National Guard. But shortly after 60 Minutes host Dan Rather revealed the documents' existence in September 2004, the gun blew up in his face. Conservative blogs Free Republic, Little Green Footballs, and Power Line questioned the authenticity of the documents--specifically, whether a 1970s-era typewriter could produce the superscript th and curly apostrophes found in the four memos.
Instead of focusing on where W actually was when he was supposed to be serving with the National Guard in 1972, political bloggers immersed themselves in the arcana of typewriter fonts--and the mainstream media followed suit. Twelve days after airing the segment, Dan Rather publicly apologized for the story, saying he could not vouch for the documents' authenticity. A few months later, he quietly left CBS--with the inevitable "gate" permanently appended to his name.
(Excerpt) Read more at tech.msn.com ...
.
DAVID SHAW: RATHER's work 'Shoddy, Slipshod'...not LIBERAL..?
http://www.Freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1227809/posts
.
"Dan Rather Bids a Font Farewell"
Well Dan.......uh....font you!
The whole premise of the article regarding the exposure by certain online sources of Rather's and CBS's attempted use of forged documents to influence a Presidential election is a lie. It was not an "internet scandal" at all - it was a "broadcast network news scandal". THEY are the ones who lied, and got caught. They OWN the scandal.
HEAR HEAR
The article is not about scandals OF the Internet.
It is about "the Net's ability to expose scoundrels, scalawags, liars, cheats, and fools--and then broadcast the scandal to a billion glowing screens".
It is about the power of the Internet to break the so-called "Mainstream Media's" previous information distribution monopoly. It is about the Internet's power to not only expose information that the MSM would previously have kept hidden but to expose even the scoundrels, scalawags, liars, cheats, and fools of the MSM itself.
In the case of Rather-gate:
"But shortly after 60 Minutes host Dan Rather revealed the documents' existence in September 2004, the gun blew up in his face. Conservative blogs Free Republic, Little Green Footballs, and Power Line questioned the authenticity of the documents--specifically, whether a 1970s-era typewriter could produce the superscript th and curly apostrophes found in the four memos .............. A few months later, he quietly left CBS--with the inevitable "gate" permanently appended to his name."
Thus, the Number One scandal was:
"1. Monica-gate and Whitewater ........ On January 17, 1998, Matt Drudge broke the news that White House intern Monica Lewinsky was having an affair with President Bill Clinton. The story appeared on his Web site, the Drudge Report, and quickly turned into one of the biggest scandals in our nation's history--and established the Internet as a news source to be reckoned with."
Before the Internet, there was so-called "Freedom of the Press" but that actually meant "Freedom of the Press Editors Only".
If the Press did not want the American People to know about something, they kept it hidden and ten thousand citizens writing one hundred thousand letters to the editor did not have the power of the arrogant editors who decided what the American People would be allowed to know and thereby exerted political power though the uninformed and misinformed electoral mass.
The Internet plus a Forum such as Free Republic allows somebody at home in his pajamas to put out information to America and the World that can bring down the credibility of CBS.
The article is about the dawn of the era of "Freedom of the People's Say" and the end of the era of "Freedom of the Press Editor Only".
Dan Rather - the gift that keeps giving.
We still need to design those honorary Rathergate pajamas.
Poor ol' Dan. He really thought he was going to bring down the President with this nonsense - I bet he cries about it today every time he thinks about it.........
its time for conservatives to "MAN UP" or walk into Whigdom
too bad FR doesn't have a torphy gallery. We could stick Rather's and Kerrey's heads in it. i'm sure we could add more.
hehe.
Except that we did. Lt. Bush wasn't due to have the physical until his birth month.
That's a different fraudulent scandal. Rathergate was about whether he was ordered to show up to a physical, whether a *retired* general was putting pressure on a LTC that it turns out liked Lt. Bush.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.