Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Peach
Thanks for your sensible outlook, Peach.

While I hesitate to even post on this thread, I am doing so. I won't respond to any Rudy haters, so don't waste an attack on me.

I am very staunchly pro-life and I "want" my president to believe the same.

I also am strongly against anything that promotes or "normalizes" the homosexual lifestyle.

All that said..............the thing that frightens me most at this point in time is terrorism. If Hillary Clinton is elected, God help us all. I also believe that, like it or not, she will be hard to beat. I think Guiliani is one candidate that very well could.

I may not like any of his liberal views but I think I might sleep better at night with him in the White House instead of Hillary. If we don't have a president the terrorists fear, we can forget all the other issues that matter. OTOH, if we can manage to stem terrorism to a decent degree, we might survive to fight the other wrongs of society, i.e. abortion, homosexuality, etc.

89 posted on 02/06/2007 4:56:29 PM PST by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Southflanknorthpawsis

I agree with every word you said. Thanks for posting. I know people don't want to because the threads turn so ugly, so our freepmails are filled with support and I do appreciate your posting on the open forum such a sensible outlook.


92 posted on 02/06/2007 4:58:11 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
I may not like any of his liberal views but I think I might sleep better at night with him in the White House instead of Hillary.

True. But more pre-borns could potentially "sleep better" in the womb w/an actual pro-life prez. (And by "sleeping better," I don't mean these little guys & gals actually have the ability to worry...I mean simply leaving their eyes intact so that sleep is possible...and some actual pro-life Supreme Court justices could overturn Roe or parts thereof).

108 posted on 02/06/2007 5:11:22 PM PST by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis

Back during the 2003 California recall, you supported RINO-Arnold. I told you back then, if Arnold wins, the next big opening for a liberal Republican would be RINO-Rudy come 2008. And here we are! I'm glad to see you posting again. Be prepared, however. This ain't 2003 and its not Arnold running for Governor. This is for the whole enchilada. Rudy maybe ahead in most polls with 30%-35% now, but without a solid majority of the GOP`s activist conservative voters choosing Rudy in the primaries, Rudy`s candidacy will come to a standstill.


109 posted on 02/06/2007 5:11:44 PM PST by Reagan Man (Conservatives don't vote for liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis

Well said. Thank you.


174 posted on 02/06/2007 7:37:50 PM PST by wouldntbprudent (If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson