Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nationwide Effort Launches to 'Draft Newt' Gingrich to Run for President (FR poll: Gingrich #1)
U.S. Newswire ^ | 1/29/07 | Mon Jan 29, 10:48 AM ET

Posted on 02/06/2007 3:18:16 PM PST by Jean S

Contact: David W. Kralik of Draft Newt, +1-202-256-6328

WASHINGTON, Jan. 29 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Newt Gingrich has indicated that running for president would now be "last resort" but that hasn't stopped a new nationwide effort from forming to urge him to run for the presidency.

"Today, we are launching a major nationwide grassroots presidential draft effort, in the spirit of Reagan and Goldwater, to urge Newt Gingrich to run for the Republican Presidential nomination," said campaign founder David W. Kralik.

The "Draft Newt" effort will take advantage of the latest in online political trends by using its web site, http://www.DraftNewt.org as the primary vehicle for grassroots organization. Contributions to the campaign will be used in communications strategies to persuade Gingrich to seek and win the Republican nomination for president.

"Gingrich's entry into the Republican primary will set him aside as the conservative alternative to those currently running," Kralik said. "His bold ideas and energy will raise the standards for all presidential aspirants and help the Republican party work to regain America's trust.

"America offers great hope for those who believe rightly that the world is a very dangerous place. We have real challenges. We have a wonderful country that can solve these challenges. Gingrich has the experience and solutions that our country needs right now."

Draft Newt is the official grassroots movement dedicated to encouraging former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich to run for President. It is not affiliated or authorized by any candidate, party or party committee. It is being spearheaded by David W. Kralik, a former Gingrich aide and veteran of many successful online grassroots political campaigns.

Reporters and individuals looking to learn more about or get involved in the effort can visit http://www.DraftNewt.org

SOURCE Draft Newt


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; draftnewt; frpoll; gingrich; newt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-198 next last
To: JeanS

I'm afraid Newt cannot win the Presidency in 2008 -- he's too polarizing. However, I'd like to see him run in order to publicize his ideas. He is a very good ideas man.


21 posted on 02/06/2007 3:40:54 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Ping


22 posted on 02/06/2007 3:41:00 PM PST by girlangler (Fish Fear Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
I guess the idea is that only Newt is talking about ideas.

The problem, though, is that when Newt talks, he talks way too much.

Also he has too much personal baggage.

23 posted on 02/06/2007 3:41:06 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Newt would lose the election in a landslide. Why?

Newt has appeal to conservative die-hards such as Freepers. Does he have appeal on a personal basis to muddled moderates? No.

Whoever the GOP chooses, the Dems and MSM will seek to demonize. Newt is a big fat juicy demonization target for the Dems. They would love it if the GOP chose him.

24 posted on 02/06/2007 3:41:43 PM PST by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

I'm afraid Newt cannot win the Presidency in 2008 -- he's too polarizing. However, I'd like to see him run in order to publicize his ideas. He is a very good ideas man.


25 posted on 02/06/2007 3:42:10 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

Like I am running a "Draft Nader" campaign.

But not because I think that he'll win, quite the opposite.


26 posted on 02/06/2007 3:43:26 PM PST by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

Gingrich said he first hoped to influence the presidential race by providing candidates in both parties with his "solutions" to problems such as health care, energy, education, national security and immigration.

Excerpt from: http://election2008warroom.blogspot.com/2007/01/gingrich-may-not-run-for-president.html


27 posted on 02/06/2007 3:43:52 PM PST by PhiKapMom (Broken Glass Republican -- Rudy/Newt -- Take back the House and Senate in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I have to admit I'd rather support Hunter than Newt.


28 posted on 02/06/2007 3:44:26 PM PST by Free Vulcan (Show them no mercy, for you shall receive none!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

You are right! Forget Newt, and Rudy? Fuggedaboutit. V's wife.


29 posted on 02/06/2007 3:45:13 PM PST by ventana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Northeastern_Realist
Newt can't win for the same reason that Hillary won't win -- too much baggage. Voters want a new choice, not a has-been.

You would think everyone would learn these lessons by now...
1. Most of the electorate are sheep willing to be lead.
2. All your baggage out is an asset! No surprises in the 11th hour.
3. You have much time to compose a gracious and clever answer to any "supposed" baggage.
4. The media can be made to look foolish with proper planning.

30 posted on 02/06/2007 3:45:17 PM PST by MarketR (Anyone else want to negotiate?" - Corbin Dallas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: pissant
I like Newt as a therotician and strategist. As a leader he showed me little.

Sometimes he's a bit off-kilter with regards to strategy, but there's no harm in expressing ones opinion.

31 posted on 02/06/2007 3:45:26 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: JeanS


Let's have a full field of GOP candidates BUMP TO THE TOP

so that all the good ideas can be brought forth and debated and all the lousy ideas can be refuted!


32 posted on 02/06/2007 3:48:33 PM PST by onyx (DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky & ally and beneficiary of Soros.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

Newt's got my vote.


33 posted on 02/06/2007 3:49:42 PM PST by gcruse (http://garycruse.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan

Duncan does not seem the type to wine and dine with media and dem types.


34 posted on 02/06/2007 3:50:52 PM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

Newt is a pretty serious thinker.


35 posted on 02/06/2007 3:51:31 PM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

Newt would be my first choice. I'd like to see some reliable polling numbers to see how he'd match up vs various Rat candidates, though.

But I think he's making a big mistake by putting off a decision to go forward. Other candidates are lining up the experienced campaign workers and the big money donors.

I think it's ridiculous that campaigns are starting earlier and earlier. JFK didn't announce until January, 1960.


36 posted on 02/06/2007 3:53:52 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

They best get cranking..... The first Primary debate for the Republican contenders is Apr. 4, 2007 in New Hampshire.... Getting a very early start this cycle.

CNN showing a new poll with [I think I have the numbers correct]

New Hampshire
McCain .. 28
Giuliani.. 27
Romney .. 13
Gingrich.. 9


37 posted on 02/06/2007 3:55:52 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS; traditional1; Jet Jaguar; The Worthless Miracle; Jim Robinson; gulfcoast6; LtdGovt; ...

Though Newt is articulate like Reagan:

1) He had 4 years to close the border, and did nothing.
2) He had 4 years to balance the budget, and did nothing.
3) His "Bohemian Grove" connection http://www.nationalreview.com/11sep95/newt.htm will hardly light a fire under the Christian vote.
4) Other assorted baggage mentioned by other freepers.

I'm ready to run with some fresh blood that is not a proven failure.


38 posted on 02/06/2007 3:56:33 PM PST by ROTB (Our Constitution...only for a [Christian] people...it is wholly inadequate for any other.-J.Q.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

He has a Q score lower than Hillary. It would be political suicide.


39 posted on 02/06/2007 3:57:24 PM PST by Buckeye Battle Cry (Life is too short to go through it clenched of sphincter and void of humor - it's okay to laugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ROTB

Sorry, bud, number 3 blew ALL your other arguments out the window.


40 posted on 02/06/2007 3:57:28 PM PST by Howlin (Honk if you like Fred Thompson!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-198 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson