1 posted on
02/06/2007 8:34:25 AM PST by
jamese777
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: jamese777
I wonder if this will hurt his reelection chances? /s
2 posted on
02/06/2007 8:36:48 AM PST by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: jamese777
The liberal media spins this as support for liberal policies, when it's really dissatisfaction that Bush is not the conservative we voted for.
3 posted on
02/06/2007 8:36:54 AM PST by
billybudd
To: jamese777
And next, the poll on the public approval rating for Congress...
(sound of crickets chirping)
4 posted on
02/06/2007 8:38:39 AM PST by
silverleaf
(Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
To: jamese777
I would venture to say the Independent vote is more significant that either the Dim or Repub votes.
5 posted on
02/06/2007 8:38:42 AM PST by
EagleUSA
To: jamese777
I wish some John Nash type could figure out a formula to apply to polls to factor OUT the MSM's influence on the results.
6 posted on
02/06/2007 8:38:47 AM PST by
msnimje
(You simply cannot be Christian and Pro-Abortion.)
To: jamese777
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
To: jamese777
8 posted on
02/06/2007 8:40:52 AM PST by
Pondman88
To: jamese777
The single biggest failure of the Bush administration is the war on public relations.
9 posted on
02/06/2007 8:42:11 AM PST by
Fierce Allegiance
("Campers laugh at clowns behind closed doors." GOHUNTER08!)
To: jamese777
Bush just announced a bunch of cuts in his new budget. I definitely approve of that.
Some of those cuts hurt me personally, but they are good for the country.
11 posted on
02/06/2007 8:44:31 AM PST by
Our man in washington
(The Democratic party is an alliance of narcissists and parasites.)
To: jamese777
That's six points higher than Truman's popularity in November, 1951. I guess we shouldn't have helped South Korea, either.
To: jamese777
The reason for the low poll numbers has more to do with disaffected conservative voters who are unhappy with Bush's support of amnesty than unappiness with the war in Iraq.
13 posted on
02/06/2007 8:47:07 AM PST by
kabar
To: jamese777
What does it matter about his approval rating? Did I miss a big change in the way things work now and he is eligible to run for office again?
What he needs to do now is tell us all this, "Hi America. I come to you now to explain how I am going to be handling the situation in the Middle East from now on. Congress isn't going to like it, the House isn't going to like it and a lot of you citizens aren't going to like it. But, I don't give a damn. It needs to be done. First off, we are going to be killing a lot of terrorists/insurgents/upset natives (What ever it is you like to call them now.) Secondly, we are going to be blowing a lot of shit up. This is how it is going to go until I feel it is time for us to pull out or until I am replaced as COMMANDER!"
16 posted on
02/06/2007 8:48:59 AM PST by
Trygar
To: jamese777
Maybe he should trade big government statism for small government conservatism. That might help his numbers.
Nah, that's crazy talk. More spending!
17 posted on
02/06/2007 8:49:00 AM PST by
mysterio
To: jamese777
More Americans disapprove than approve of his handling of seven different issues tested in the poll;More and more Americans have no understanding of what is going on around them today. They are plugged into American Idol or Dancing with the Stars.
19 posted on
02/06/2007 8:49:54 AM PST by
marvlus
To: jamese777
Well, he still gets the Rock Star treatment on Wall Street.
20 posted on
02/06/2007 8:50:10 AM PST by
38special
(I mean come'on.)
To: jamese777
Bush's poll numbers are not so much about the "job he's doing" as it is about the percent of weenies in our population.
21 posted on
02/06/2007 8:52:15 AM PST by
FixitGuy
(By their fruits shall ye know them!)
To: jamese777
I am very glad that President Bush is a real leader who does not give a damn about polls. In times of war we need a Leader President not a politician President.
22 posted on
02/06/2007 8:54:18 AM PST by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: jamese777; All
Well .. Rasmussen still has Bush above 40% - and even they are oversampling dems by 7%. So .. actually Bush is even closer to 45% than ANYONE IS WILLING TO ADMIT.
And .. it was recently discovered that some pollsters were oversampling dems by as much as 22% (which is way out of line) - and is an increase over the 16% they were using during the 2006 elections.
If these idiots are having to increase their oversampling by 6% in order to get the low numbers they want .. then Bush MUST BE INCREASING IN APPROVAL .. NOT DECREASING.
How about a few letters to the editors around the country pointing out these FAKE NUMBERS.
30 posted on
02/06/2007 9:04:08 AM PST by
CyberAnt
(Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
To: jamese777
It only shows what happens when a politician tries to please everybody.
To: jamese777
Wonder if they took this poll at the hippie dippie rally in Washington last week.These polls crack me up , who took them the arab Zogby or the one hired by CNN or the of course wonderful new york times
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson