No facts - no news - just the claim that everyone is out to catch the author because of his differing opinion. .
It doesn't mean he's wrong, he just has to demonstrate why his view is more scientifically supportable than the other side.
And as a degreed geologist I know a little about the environment.
Thirded. This piece was all fluff-and-nonsense. And Ball's stating his credentials partly because he's in a court case about whether or not he's really a climate expert.