Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Achieving Socially Conservative Ideals Through Liberal Means: Making The Case for Rudy (2008)
Red State ^ | February 4, 2007 | D.M. Eaton

Posted on 02/04/2007 11:08:45 AM PST by Clintonfatigued

For this reason, contrary to conventional wisdom, a victory by Rudy Giuliani would strengthen even the socially conservative agenda in the long run. As the new Fox Dynamics Poll shows, 65 percent of Americans would be “comfortable” with a Rudy Giuliani administration. Being comfortable is a major step in the right direction. Americans might actually listen to him when gives the State of the Union (without a teleprompter no less, as he usually speaks with note cards or does so extemporaneously). A Giuliani administration that would focus on fighting the Islamic Extremists, reducing the size and scope of government, handling crisis, and putting strict constructionists on the bench who will interpret the law properly will draw more support from more people in the short term. This will translate to more understanding of conservative policies on other matters because individuals will have more patience to read the conservative ramblings of columnists and pundits. In the long run, as a result this will turn into more votes. As Winston Churchill is often quoted, "If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain"...

Due to the challenges facing this country, this election cycle we Republicans need to nominate someone with an actual record of accomplishment of tackling seemingly intractable problems. As George Will said on “This Week,” “His eight years as mayor of New York were the most successful episode of conservative governance in this country in the last 50 years, on welfare and crime particularly." Giuliani, more than any other candidate (Romney comes the closest) has the record of taking on major institutions and reforming them.

(Excerpt) Read more at redstate.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; bluestate; burnnycburn; elections; goombah; guiliani; liberal; medialies; mussoliniclone; nonchristian; notanythingwrongwit; nyscks; rudy; rudysroomate; socialist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 281 next last
To: CobaltBlue

I set up a hypothetical within the poster's belief matrix. It was not about what the nexus should be between government and God and/or religion, or what the Founders thought it should be, or what the Constitution says it is.


81 posted on 02/04/2007 1:27:52 PM PST by Torie (The real facts can sometimes be inconvenient things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

No, dear, you're quite hopelessly ignorant of the principles of federalism if you think that sentence you highlighted in red is all one needs to know federalism.

But I really am wasting my breath here. And have better things to do.



82 posted on 02/04/2007 1:27:55 PM PST by CobaltBlue (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

"This is an interesting argument, and there is some logic to it. While I'm not advocating voting for Guiliani (I'm undecided), I do think that conservatives who rule out voting for him without much reflection and study of his accomplishments are short-sighted."

I support Condi Rice during the primaries. If RG is the Republican nominee, I'll certainly support and vote for him. Too bad I don't have the scruples of a Democrat, I could vote for Rudi multiple times with a clear conscience.


83 posted on 02/04/2007 1:27:59 PM PST by Rembrandt (We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Torie

I am simply observing that debating whether God thinks homosexuality is an abomination isn't really relevant to whether or not Giuliani is a good candidate.

It's a free country, you can do whatever you wish with your time.


84 posted on 02/04/2007 1:29:35 PM PST by CobaltBlue (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

When Congress enacted immigration reform laws that forbade local governments from barring employees from cooperating with the INS, Mayor Rudy Giuliani filed suit against the feds in 1997. He was rebuffed by two lower courts, which ruled that the sanctuary order amounted to special treatment for illegal aliens and were nothing more than an unlawful effort to flaunt federal enforcement efforts against illegal aliens. In January 2000, the Supreme Court rejected his appeal, but Giuliani vowed to ignore the law.


But I keep hearing that Rudy is a law and order guy.


85 posted on 02/04/2007 1:30:44 PM PST by freedomfiter2 (Hunter '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
It's a free country, you can do whatever you wish with your time.

How accommodating of you. I appreciate your giving me permission to do so. Best.

86 posted on 02/04/2007 1:31:59 PM PST by Torie (The real facts can sometimes be inconvenient things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Sun

"Rudy is weak on borders; so therefore, would be weak on fighting terrorism."

There may be some truth in what you say, but it's highly debateable. While he does have some identifiable weaknesses (to Conservatives), he has one undeniable and striking strength - he has great charisma. That got Bubba elected, it can get Rudi elected. He'll be a great campaigner.

He would stand a great chance of taking New York which Republicans typically lose.


87 posted on 02/04/2007 1:32:15 PM PST by Rembrandt (We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
The Founders never intended for religious issues to be decided by the federal government.

Sorry, but the murder of unborn Americans is not a "religious" issue, any more than any other kind of murder is.

Go read the preamble to the Constitution: its very premise. It guarantees equal rights to our posterity. (Buying you a clue: "posterity" means those who are not yet born.)

Also, the idea that marriage issues are not federal ones is completely destroyed by the fact that Congress quite explicitly legislated that several states could not even enter, or stay within, the Union unless and until they forsook plural marriage.

88 posted on 02/04/2007 1:32:17 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: freedomfiter2
But I keep hearing that Rudy is a law and order guy.

Yep. But his actions speak so loudly I can't hear what they're saying...

89 posted on 02/04/2007 1:33:21 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue

Abortion and homosexuality are not federal issues.

Then why did the SCOTUS take away tye states' right to legislate on these issues?


90 posted on 02/04/2007 1:33:25 PM PST by freedomfiter2 (Hunter '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
While he was the “Republican Mayor” of New York City he appointed more than 60 men and women to the Civil, Criminal, and Family Court benchs. In all of those judicial appointment not one of them was a Republican.

All of his judical appointments were either registered Liberals or registered Democrats. As the “Republican Mayor” he had appointment power over more than 70 full commissioners in more than 50 City agencies, yet at no time during his administration did REPUBLICANS account for more than 10% of those appointments.

He even appointed Chuck Schumers wife as the City’s Department of Transportation Commissioner.


________________________________________________________________
http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/9054.html
91 posted on 02/04/2007 1:34:39 PM PST by narses ("Freedom is about authority." - Rudolph Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

Soooo, This guy wanted Gore in 2000 but could now settle for Rudy.

It's not much of a stretch.


92 posted on 02/04/2007 1:34:53 PM PST by freedomfiter2 (Hunter '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
Tuesday, June 20, 2000 MAYOR GIULIANI AND SPEAKER VALLONE ANNOUNCE CITY LAWSUIT AGAINST GUN INDUSTRY

Rudy has contempt for our Right to Keep and Bear Arms. He is a RINO.

93 posted on 02/04/2007 1:35:32 PM PST by narses ("Freedom is about authority." - Rudolph Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
The Founders never intended for religious issues to be decided by the federal government.

98 U.S. 145

REYNOLDS

v.

UNITED STATES.

October Term, 1878

"Laws are made for the government of actions, and while they cannot interfere with mere religious belief and opinions, they may with practices. Suppose one believed that human sacrifices were a necessary part of religious worship, would it be seriously contended that the civil government under which he lived could not interfere to prevent a sacrifice?

...Can a man excuse his practices to the contrary because of his religious belief? [98 U.S. 145, 167] To permit this would be to make the professed doctrines of religious belief superior to the law of the land, and in effect to permit every citizen to become a law unto himself. Government could exist only in name under such circumstances."


94 posted on 02/04/2007 1:35:41 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue

If rudy wins the presidential election, the Democrat Party will control both houses, the white house, and the courts.

"If you want that to happen, you are an idiot."


95 posted on 02/04/2007 1:36:16 PM PST by patton (Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu
I’m pro-choice. I’m pro-gay rights, Giuliani said. He was then asked whether he supports a ban on what critics call partial-birth abortions. “No, I have not supported that, and I don’t see my position on that changing,” he responded. Source: CNN.com, “Inside Politics” Dec 2, 1999 http://www.ontheissues.org/2008/Rudy_Giuliani_Abortion.htm

ANDERSON COOPER 360 DEGREES (November 14, 2006)

RUDY GIULIANI (R), FORMER MAYOR OF NEW YORK CITY: I'm pro- choice. I'm pro-gay rights.

KING: Giuliani supports a woman's right to an abortion, and back in 1999, he opposed a federal ban on late-term abortions.

GIULIANI: No, I have not supported that, and I don't see my position on that changing.

KING: Immigration could be another presidential landmine. Back in 1996, Mayor Giuliani went to federal court to challenge new federal laws requiring the city to inform the federal government about illegal immigrants.

JEFFREY: He took the side of illegal immigrants in New York City against the Republican Congress.

KING: Giuliani opposes same-sex marriage but as mayor, he supported civil unions and extending health and other benefits to gay couples. He also supported the assault weapons ban and other gun control measures opposed by the National Rifle Association.

GIULIANI: I'm in favor of gun control. I'm pro-choice.

Republican Big-Wigs Support Pro-Abortion Event in NY

Pro-abortion Governor George Pataki and New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who also supports unrestricted abortion, are co-chairs of the 2000 Choice Award Presentation to be held on May 30 at the St. Regis Hotel in New York City. The event is sponsored by the Republican Pro-Choice Coalition, a group that is campaigning for the removal of the pro-life plank from the Republican National Platform.


http://www.nationalreview.com/murdock/murdock200503010743.asp


96 posted on 02/04/2007 1:36:22 PM PST by narses ("Freedom is about authority." - Rudolph Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Torie
if you became convinced as a scientific fact that some people are wired from birth to be gay, would that influence your theological assumption that God considers such behavior an abomination?

No. And you're never going to find such proof. God knows the Left has tried.

97 posted on 02/04/2007 1:36:47 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: freedomfiter2

Brilliant question.


98 posted on 02/04/2007 1:37:50 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

So if the scientific proof emerged (I appreciate that you don't think it will), then apparently in your view in such event not all are created in God's image. Who knew?


99 posted on 02/04/2007 1:38:51 PM PST by Torie (The real facts can sometimes be inconvenient things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue

You just refuse to read the Constitution... it is very clear you think of it as toilet paper...


100 posted on 02/04/2007 1:39:02 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 281 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson