Scary stuff from this chick's blog, thanks to Liestoppers:
From a poster named Harkonnandog. Who knows, this could be Danny Glover.
"Rape is a crime unlike others. In any rape case, but especially in a rape case where a black woman accuses a white man, the rapist should be considered guilty until he proves his innocence. And he must prove his innocence not beyond a reasonable doubt, but beyond any possible doubt. The Durham rapists have not done so, by any means.
People claim this is unfair, but 400 years of slavery and countless millenium of male on female rape make this not only fair, but necessary. Let’s just say the accusation of rape IS false, that doesn’t take away the rapists (yes, they’re still rapists even if these particular men didn’t rape this particular women) genealogical guilt. How many slaves have their forefathers raped? Nobody asks that question.
And I”ve no doubt these men would be raping slaves if they could get away with it. They are white and rich, they are jocks, they attend an expensive university, (no doubt with money saved from when their families owned plantations) and they hired black strippers. Even worse, they requested white strippers first, which proves they are bigots.
People who talk about the details of guilt in this particular case are missing the forest for the trees. The narrative is bigger than 3 white boys whose lives are inconsequential compared to the sweep of history- of the descendants of slaves getting just recompense on the descendants of slave owners."
Wow. Ask me again why I keep guns.
http://z9.invisionfree.com/LieStoppers_Board/index.php?showtopic=1967
Could be any uber-leftist, moonbat Dhimmi... or even an Indonesian-educated, Dhimmicrat Senator from Illinois.
"Rape is a crime unlike others. In any rape case, but especially in a rape case where a black woman accuses a white man, the rapist should be considered guilty until he proves his innocence. And he must prove his innocence not beyond a reasonable doubt, but beyond any possible doubt. The Durham rapists have not done so, by any means.
Double B.S.
Mr. Elwood: Why are black victims more valuable when attacked by whites? Are black victims attacked by other blacks less traumatized? Are they “less dead” when murdered by other blacks? Yes, those are ridiculous questions, but not as ridiculous as the perceived lack of self-respect when our community leaders fail to pursue and hold those people accountable inside our communities who are preying upon us. According to research, blacks are more than seven times more likely to be assaulted by other blacks
My imagined Mr. Glover's response: These black thugs preying on other Blacks are only acting out the evil white patriarchy they've been enslaved under. It's pouring out of them, they are acting as zombies under 200 years of white man's rule; it's in the blood now. It's not their fault. It's the legacy of slavery. For $100,000 which I will give to Hugo Chavez, invite me to Durham to clean up the mess left by the whitey named Nifong. Blacks in Durham only voted him into office because they too are down-to-the-bone infected with the results of slavery, and just can't say no the the white man."
Looks like I might be liable for a few thefts, murders and late library book fines too.
Yikes!
Can you imagine someone like that on a jury? Not only will they defy their instructions they will intimidate those who disagree with them. That was one scary diatribe of hatred, I will never understand how people can think this way.
This is nothing particularly scarey about this. These are Dims. They are totalitarians. They are ignorant of history. They believe is special rights for groups that vote disproprotionately Dim.
I guess on one level they are scarey. But there is not excuse to be surprised by them.