Skip to comments.
Angry Hillary: Attack on Iraq Wrong
NewsMax ^
| 3 February 2007
Posted on 02/03/2007 3:00:52 AM PST by Aussie Dasher
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
Hitlery and Edwards are as two-faced as F'n Kerry.
They supported the war before they opposed it...
To: Aussie Dasher
"And let me add one other thing, and I want to be very clear about this," she said. "If I had been president in October of 2002, I would not have started this war." And yet she had no problem voting for the resolution which authorized it.
The next 18 months are going to be really fun.
L
2
posted on
02/03/2007 3:03:40 AM PST
by
Lurker
(Europeans killed 6 million Jews. As a reward they got 40 million Moslems. Karma's a bitch.)
To: Lurker
She wants it both ways....claiming the takedown of Saddam was wrong because we suspected he had WMD ....yet wants to keep all options on the table when it comes to Iran.
3
posted on
02/03/2007 3:07:53 AM PST
by
Dog
To: Aussie Dasher
Hillary Rodham Clinton said Thursday no option can be taken off the table when dealing with that nation. "U.S. policy must be clear and unequivocal: We cannot, we should not, we must not permit Iran to build or acquire nuclear weapons," the Democrat told a crowd of Israel supporters. "In dealing with this threat ... no option can be taken off the table."
4
posted on
02/03/2007 3:11:29 AM PST
by
Dog
To: Aussie Dasher
Hillary gives harridans a bad name...
To: All
6
posted on
02/03/2007 3:13:42 AM PST
by
Cindy
To: Aussie Dasher
The MSM is still pushing Obama, so Hill has to unleash the dogs on him...leak damaging information, truth or not. It will look as if it came from someone else. She'll stop at nothing to get the nomination.
7
posted on
02/03/2007 3:15:44 AM PST
by
hershey
To: Aussie Dasher
That Hillary sure is a headline grabber. What would Bill do? Grab head.
8
posted on
02/03/2007 3:19:46 AM PST
by
PGalt
To: Aussie Dasher
"Clinton, raising her voice at one point to be heard above anti-war hecklers, suggested that calls from Edwards and others to cut off funding for President Bush's troop increase are unlikely to win approval in a narrowly divided Senate."
So what about your vote? Shore up support for the troops and send more or defund them and not send re-enforements? Yea or nay?
9
posted on
02/03/2007 3:23:15 AM PST
by
moonman
To: moonman
OK, who has her quotes from '90s and up to 2002 ?
10
posted on
02/03/2007 3:31:52 AM PST
by
sure_fine
( • not one to over kill the thought process™ •)
To: Aussie Dasher
I guess she's trying to attract the pro-terrorist vote.
11
posted on
02/03/2007 3:33:26 AM PST
by
djpg
To: djpg
Competing with Edwards for those...
12
posted on
02/03/2007 3:34:27 AM PST
by
Aussie Dasher
(The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
To: Aussie Dasher
Just like Kerry, she's been on every side of this issue. For it, against it, wants more troops, opposes it once it's happening... Talk about covering your bases!
To: Aussie Dasher
If we in Congress don't end this war before January 2009, as president, I will." What's this? A campaign promise?
From the woman who less than 6 months ago PROMISED that if reelected to the Senate from New York, she wouldn't run for President.
Yeah, she's trustworthy....
14
posted on
02/03/2007 3:39:27 AM PST
by
IrishRainy
("There's not a single solitary nuclear missile pointed at an American child tonight." Oct. 96)
To: Aussie Dasher
I guess that the Clinton's and dems are so out of touch with the rest of the world, that they don't know that we have access to all of their video and audio from forever.
The Clinton's think that the average joe is just plain stupid and ignorant and no memory to boot.
15
posted on
02/03/2007 3:39:49 AM PST
by
Coldwater Creek
(The TERRORIST are the ones who won the midterm elections!)
To: mariabush
The average joe did elect BJ TWICE...
16
posted on
02/03/2007 3:41:33 AM PST
by
Aussie Dasher
(The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
To: Aussie Dasher
17
posted on
02/03/2007 3:42:26 AM PST
by
Cvengr
To: Aussie Dasher
"Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton said Friday she would not have attacked Iraq if she were president in 2002...."The lieberal elite like to compartmentalize our thinking. Its like the diversity initiatives. Senator Dumb A$$ conveniently fails to recognize that the war on terror was started by these islamic fascists prior to 2002 and that Iraq is a battle in that war. I wonder if the islamofascists will wait until she is elected to hit us again, she is such a fellow traveler afterall.
18
posted on
02/03/2007 3:50:58 AM PST
by
RushLake
(I neutered my dog; now he's a liberal.)
To: Aussie Dasher
And Kerry got 46% of the vote, which I find absolutely frightening. The dinosaur media is losing its customers in droves and hemorrhaging money, but people are still getting their daily dose of BS from somewhere. With the media flooding everything and singing the same tune, it's still getting through.
To: Lurker
Not if the media refuse to ask her a real question or challenge her misstatements (Lies),
20
posted on
02/03/2007 3:59:33 AM PST
by
Joe Boucher
(an enemy of islam)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson