Rudy and the Republican Nomination

Over the last month or two there has been a good deal of public opinion polling on the 2008 Republican primary race. I thought it would be helpful to take a step back and take a closer look at how voters – particularly Republican primary voters – feel about Rudy Giuliani and why we think we are well-positioned heading in to the primary season.

Americans Have a Highly Favorable Opinion of Mayor Giuliani
Entering the 2008 primary season, Rudy Giuliani is uniquely positioned among potential Republican candidates because of his extremely high favorability ratings. Recent public opinion polling shows Mayor Giuliani with 61% approval among adults across the country – according to the ABC News/Washington Post poll (Jan. 16-19, 2007). The well respected, bipartisan Battleground Poll (Jan 8-11, 2007) shows the Mayor with 65% favorability among likely voters. More importantly, Mayor Giuliani shows an 81% favorable rating among Republicans and only 10% with an unfavorable opinion.

According to the Battleground poll, Mayor Giuliani also has surprisingly high favorability ratings beyond the base:

In an even more recent poll, Gallup (Jan. 25-28, 2007) finds Mayor Giuliani also leads among Republicans on 7 of 10 key issues including terrorism, the economy, healthcare and fighting crime. He also leads on 11 of 15 key candidate attributes – including “better understands the problems faced by ordinary Americans”, “would manage government more effectively” and what I believe to be the single most important factor – “is the stronger leader.”

In sum, while we fully expect these polls to tighten in the months and weeks to come, Republican voters genuinely know and like Rudy Giuliani.

The Mayor Performs Well in Opinion Polls
The Mayor’s exceptionally strong approval ratings also translate in to an advantage on Republican primary ballot tests. In 11 of 13 ballot tests in respected national public opinion polls [Fox News, Newsweek, Time Gallup, CNN, NBC/Wall Street Journal, ABC/Washington Post] since last November, Mayor Giuliani has a lead – in fact, his lead is on average, more than 5-points over the next closest candidate. And his ballot strength began to trend upward after the 2006 midterm elections.

Mayor Giuliani Leads in Key 2008 Primary States
Mayor Giuliani also leads in a series of other states that will likely prove critical in the 2008 Republican primary:

Mayor Giuliani’s favorable public opinion stems not only from his extraordinary leadership in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks and in the uncertainty that followed, but also from a remarkably strong record of accomplishments in fighting crime and turning around New York City’s economy in the 1990’s.

Americans are anxious for fresh Republican leadership on a range of issues. Our voters are drawn to the leadership strength of a candidate during an election. Therefore, as we move forward with exploring a run for President and as we continue to share the Mayor’s story of strong leadership and Reagan-like optimism and vision, we hope to see continued growth in our foundation of support.

The Battleground poll thinks they will hold and all this pontificating by some especially on this forum is just that... pontificating...... They think the battleground will be with the independents and who can sway them. It appears it's incumbent upon the GOP to sway them back into the fold or it's a lost cause this time around.

Ed Goeas: The Future As the Presidential Campaign Takes Shape
Looking at the 2008 Presidential Elections, the Republican Party has two strong and popular potential candidates – Rudy Giuliani (64%favorable/22% unfavorable) and John McCain (62% favorable/25% unfavorable). Both are at a 2.5 to 1 favorable/unfavorable ratio and both have strong images with Independents and in the Northeast, Midwest, and West – all demographics where the Republican Party has struggled in recent years.
In addition, Mitt Romney (22% favorable/13% unfavorable) has a slightly positive image with considerable room to grow with 46% of likely voters having never heard of him.
In contrast, while the presumptive front runner for the Democrats – Senator Hillary Clinton (51% favorable/46% unfavorable – 27% strongly favorable/35% strongly unfavorable) – does have a slightly positive image with a majority of the likely electorate, she also has a considerable number of likely voters already holding intensely negative views about her. In addition, her no image score is just 3%, so her challenge will be to convert opponents into supporters, rather than sell herself to uninformed voters.
Some of the other contenders like John Edwards (49% favorable/29% unfavorable) and Barack Obama (46% favorable/21% unfavorable) have name identification scores in line with Hillary Clinton’s score, but trail her in popularity with Democrats. Also, both of them enjoy a 27% favorable rating from Republicans, which is likely to dissipate quickly in the heat of the 2008 race.
On the trial 2008 ballots, McCain and Giuliani have very similar numbers against both Hillary and Obama. Both Republicans run strong with Independents. The breakdown is:

• McCain (53%) versus H. Clinton (43%)
• McCain (51%) versus Obama (39%)
• Giuliani (53%) versus H. Clinton (43%)
• Giuliani (50%) versus Obama (41%).

Looking ahead, the GOP has a history of focusing very quickly on two candidates and a history of nominating the front runner. Either we are going to have a battle between the two five hundred pound gorillas, or Giuliani will not enter the race, making room for an alternative to McCain to get some traction. In that scenario, the person who seems to be building the organization, resources, and money to be the last man standing is Mitt Romney.
On the Democratic side, there is much more history of the primaries remaining focused longer on multiple candidates, making room for sleeper candidates to surface much later in the nomination process. Hillary Clinton certainly has everything going for her as the frontrunner for the Democratic nomination; the question over the next twelve months is whether Democratic primary voters will take pause when they see how polarizing she is with the general electorate. This data is certainly a cautionary indicator to national Democrats about the capacity of Senator Clinton to defeat either of the possible GOP candidates for President.

Conclusion
The 2008 Presidential Election will be the first election since 1952 that neither a president is running for re-election nor the President’s Vice President is running to replace him. It is truly an “open seat” Presidential race and will certainly bring some new twists to the process, evidenced by the fact that the race for the nomination for both parties is starting earlier than ever.
Other areas of the presidential campaign will see a greater emphasis as well. While the “vision thing” is always a part of every presidential election, it promises to be even more so in the 2008 Presidential Election. With this being an “open seat,” look for both party nomination fights and the general election to be as much an election about the future as it is about the past.
Perhaps one of the indicators of this potentially being another close election built around the future is a question we asked about voters’ attitudes about our children’s future. When asked in our latest George Washington University Battleground about their children’s future, thirty-nine percent (39%) of voters feel their children will be better off than they are, thirty-seven percent (37%) felt their children would be worse off, and nineteen percent (19%) felt their children’s lives would be about the same. But unlike other questions where Republicans are at one end of the spectrum, Democratic voters at the other end of the spectrum, and Independent voters often averaging the norm - this question shows Republicans are a net fifteen-points positive about their children’s future, Democratic voters are a net three-points negative about their children’s future, and Independent voters are a net twenty-points negative about their children’s future.
In last year’s Congressional Elections, we saw the impact of a major shift in attitudes with Independent voters. It truly cost the Republican Party control of the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate. When it comes to which party wins control of the White House in the 2008 election, it may very well come down to which party’s Presidential candidate can capture a majority from Independent voters. More specifically, victory may come to the candidate who can show they can shape a better future (America) in the lives of the children of those Independent voters.
It has been said that the American Dream is not about today, but that the American Dream is seeing our children’s and grandchildren’s lives improve spiritually, educationally, economically, and in their personal safety. While 9/11, the war on terror, and the Iraqi War have all served to make the path to that American Dream less clear, so has the partisan politics of the last fifteen years. Who knows, maybe with an “open seat” presidential race, especially one focused on “swing” Independent voters and focused on our children’s future, maybe we as a nation can regain the “American Dream” as a top priority as it was in 1952.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

To:	Team Rudy
From:	Brent Seaborn, Strategy Director
Date:	February 2, 2007
Re:	Rudy and the Republican Nomination

State	Mayor Giuliani	Closest Competitor	Source
California	33%	19% (Gingrich)	ARG - Jan. 11-17
Florida	30%	16% (Gingrich)	ARG - Jan. 4-9
Illinois	33%	24% (McCain)	ARG - Jan. 11-14
Michigan	34%	24% (McCain)	ARG - Jan. 4-7
Nevada	31%	25% (McCain)	ARG - Dec. 19-23, ‘06
New Jersey	39%	21% (McCain)	Quinnipiac – Jan. 16-22
North Carolina	34%	26% (McCain)	ARG - Jan. 11-15
Ohio	30%	22% (McCain)	Quinnipiac - Jan. 23-28
Pennsylvania	35%	25% (McCain)	ARG Jan. 4-8
Texas	28%	26% (McCain)	Baselice Jan. 17-21