Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US think tank offering cash to dispute UN climate panel: report
AFP via Yahoo! News ^ | 2/2/07 | AFP

Posted on 02/02/2007 8:45:35 AM PST by libertarianPA

LONDON (AFP) - A right-wing American think tank is offering 10,000 dollars (7,700 euros) to scientists and economists to dispute a climate change report set to be released by the UN's top scientific panel, media reported.

The American Enterprise Institute (AEI), which receives funding from oil giant ExxonMobil according to the Guardian, sent letters to scientists in the United States, Britain and elsewhere offering the payments in exchange for articles emphasising the shortcoming of the UN's report.

AEI also reportedly offered additional payments, and to reimburse travel expenses.

The report, due to be released Friday in Paris by the UN's Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC), is likely to give a bleak assessment of the damage to the future of the environment.

It is the culmination of four days of debate between more then 500 scientists at a closed-door meeting in Paris, who have been poring over the first review of the scientific evidence for global warming in six years.

AEI's letters characterize the IPCC report as "resistant to reasonable criticism and dissent and prone to summary conclusions that are poorly supported by the analytical work" and request articles that "thoughtfully explore the limitations of climate model outputs," The Guardian said.

Kenneth Green, the AEI visiting scholar who sent the letters, confirmed to The Guardian that the thinktank had approached scientists and analysts to pen essays that would be compiled into an independent review of the IPCC's report.

"Right now, the whole debate is polarized," Green was quoted as saying by the newspaper.

"One group says that anyone with any doubts whatsoever are deniers and the other group is saying that anyone who wants to take action is alarmist. We don't think that approach has a lot of utility for intelligent policy."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aei; climatechange; globalwarming; unreport
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
The American Enterprise Institute (AEI), which receives funding from oil giant ExxonMobil...

Stated as if the scientists on the IPCC are free of subjective influence.
1 posted on 02/02/2007 8:45:38 AM PST by libertarianPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

It's pretty stupid for EXXON to not distance themselves more from the study. Now the study will have absolutely no impact whatsoever.


2 posted on 02/02/2007 8:47:45 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

If we only accept science which is unfunded, then only those scientists doing science as a religious exercise will be issuing reports and doing studies.


3 posted on 02/02/2007 8:48:51 AM PST by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

And how many zillions of dollars are given to the pro-global warming gloom & doom crowd each year for their phony projections?


4 posted on 02/02/2007 8:48:57 AM PST by Reagan is King (Those who say it cannot be done should not interrupt the people doing it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

Yep, normally I would cry foul over the funding, but then global warming scientists are funded to push global warming all the time. So I guess it balances out.


5 posted on 02/02/2007 8:49:08 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

The cause of global awarming is that bright thingy thing in the sky during the daytime.


6 posted on 02/02/2007 8:53:21 AM PST by isthisnickcool (The only reason you are still conscious is because I don't want to carry you- J. Bauer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
Yep, normally I would cry foul over the funding, but then global warming scientists are funded to push global warming all the time. So I guess it balances out.

Yes it does. I personally appreciate Exxon doing this for a free people.
The global warming propaganda is designed to scare people into handing businesses and private properties over to the governments. That's socialism/communism.
Take a look at which groups are pushing this global warming propaganda. The socialists and communists are, of course.

7 posted on 02/02/2007 8:55:15 AM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

They should have offered $1 million each.


8 posted on 02/02/2007 8:55:59 AM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
It's pretty stupid for EXXON to not distance themselves more from the study. Now the study will have absolutely no impact whatsoever.

Too bad the euro elitists didn't distance themselves from their IPCC report. Now they are going to lose their impact, except for the usual leftists and MSM.

9 posted on 02/02/2007 8:57:15 AM PST by palmer (Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

If everyone pulishes the basis for their conclusions, then all can see the data and evaluate its appropriateness. I never hear global waarming people speak of the nexis between human activity and global warming. They only site examples that they aassume are from human intervension.


My question is: Why do they believe that all natural processes became static, and that the Earth is no longer affected by the sun, variations in the orbit of the Earth, volcanos and the like?

Do they have evidence that none of these processes vary in any meaningful way any longer?


10 posted on 02/02/2007 8:59:49 AM PST by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

Today the MSM carries an item that says it is 90% certain humans are responsible for Global Warming. It should read 100%. Humans might be responsible for 25% of global warming, which is entirely different.


11 posted on 02/02/2007 9:02:15 AM PST by RightWhale (300 miles north of Big Wild Life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: palmer

All that really has to happen is for a group of concerned scientists to get together and have a press conference showing CO2 levels and climate records for the last 500K years. I saw the chart this morning. Both have fluctuated in cycles well before there were carbon emissions from manmade sources.


12 posted on 02/02/2007 9:03:42 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

Haven't you heard? 500 years ago it was campfires in the castles to roast old goat...


13 posted on 02/02/2007 9:05:47 AM PST by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota
My question is: Why do they believe that all natural processes became static, and that the Earth is no longer affected by the sun, variations in the orbit of the Earth, volcanos and the like?

Because the real goal is a government take over of private industry. It's socialism. Get it? Share the wealth!

It isn't scientific. That's just the cover page. This is political propaganda.

14 posted on 02/02/2007 9:06:08 AM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

It's pretty stupid for EXXON to not distance themselves more from the study. Now the study will have absolutely no impact whatsoever.

''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

No impact in the media perhaps, but facts are facts. Private money is no dirtier than public money when used for research. As the worlds largest supplier of fossil fuel, Exxon has a responsibility to vigorously defend itself against false claims about its product. The truth will eventually prevail, but it won't be because government said so, it will be because the actual science "proves" it is so.


15 posted on 02/02/2007 9:06:34 AM PST by photodawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

Then who paid for all those scientists to go to Paris to work on this. They could have just as easily have met in say...Cleveland. Did they fly on their own nickels?

Someone stop the turnip truck, I want to get back on.


16 posted on 02/02/2007 9:09:04 AM PST by SueRae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics

Are there no official scientific commissions or panels apopointed by the administration that quetion the existing scientific basis for this?

Or has the administration chalked this up to a "loss" thereby kicking it down the road for the next administration, like he is for illegal immigration and the like?

Let's do what the Dems always want...a blue ribbon commission of scientists from all over the world to debate the science. No politicians allowed...


17 posted on 02/02/2007 9:10:13 AM PST by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool
The cause of global awarming is that bright thingy thing in the sky during the daytime.

Anecdotally, I see this fact over and over this winter. I live in North Carolina (a relatively southern state), and we have had numerous unseasonably warm days, but the strange thing is that they don't start off warm. In fact, we have seem dramatic swings from a very frigid night (clear skies, temperatures plummeting into the mid 20's) then in the morning and throughout the day the temperatures heat up rapidly into the 60's.

Now, if my understanding of greenhouse warming is correct, such extreme temperature swings should be prevented by an insulating greenhouse gas layer which retains heat in the atmosphere during the night (when my portion of the earth faces away from the sun). But that is not what is happening here. (In fact I wonder if it is happening anywhere??) What I am seeing is NOTHING trapping the heat at night, temperatures dropping dramatically, then the day temperatures rise dramatically in daylight hours (which can only be attributed to the SUN, and if it is the sun it can only be because of increased solar activity).

Now, if an insulating layer exists, causing increasing temperatures, does it come and go? Does it exist in some parts of the world and not in others? Shouldn't it reduce the difference in temperature extremes from night to day because of a temperature stabilization effect(kind of like an insulated cooler)?

I think the only phenomenon that I am witnessing is obvious evidence of increased solar output, and nothing that even resembles the effects of some sort of insulating blanket caused by greenhouse gases? Doesn't the fact that temperatures plummet on clear winter nights disprove the greenhouse theory?
18 posted on 02/02/2007 9:10:21 AM PST by AaronInCarolina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
So I guess it balances out.

I don't think so.

Late last night I was watching the weather chanel. Some woman named Heidi with a Phd. was on talking about global warming as a fact. Finally, I just turned back to local for the weather. We can't do anything about global warming if it is a fact. All of the world wants us to quit driving and that won't happen if we have to support the world and the useless thugs at the UN.

19 posted on 02/02/2007 9:12:08 AM PST by texastoo ("trash the treaties")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: photodawg
Exxon has a responsibility to vigorously defend itself against false claims about its product.

But surely someone there has to know that Exxon's funding of a study will do more to cement global warming as "fact" than doing nothing would. Exxon is about as well liked right now as Phillip Morris.
20 posted on 02/02/2007 9:14:24 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson