You all ask the tough questions of Rudy which is correct but none of you seem to question Hunter because he is Chairman of Armed Services. Why not? Why not put all our candidates under the same microscope that you are putting Rudy? You all blindly follow a candidate without any hesitation. Afraid of what you might find with other candidates?
We know Rudy's background and I still support him. I did an in-depth study of Rudy and every candidate before deciding to support him because I believe he is the best man for the job. I could care less if someone has been divorced -- don't walk in their shoes. I do care about someone standing up with a spine to take on the WOT.
Yes, EVERY single candidate should and MUST be put under the microscope and probed. Just picking someone, because one "believes" a surface image and/or a few stray bits of information, and then promoting him or her, is not a wise thing to do. Who knows what lurks beneath the surface, of an UNKNOWN ?