Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi Wants Access to Military Flights ... for relatives and others
newsmax.com ^ | Thursday, Feb. 1, 2007 12:30 a.m. EST

Posted on 02/01/2007 11:27:35 AM PST by InvisibleChurch

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office is pressing the White House for routine access to military aircraft for not only herself and her staff, but for relatives and other members of the California delegation as well.

A knowledgeable Washington, D.C. source called the request "carte blanche for an aircraft any time."

Another source told the Washington Times: "They are pressing the point of her succession and that the [Department of Defense] needs to play ball with the speaker's needs.”

The request originally went to the Pentagon, which passed it along to the White House.

Pelosi's request for military aircraft access is not the first from a speaker, who is second in line in presidential succession.

The speaker gained regular access to military planes after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Rep. J. Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., who was speaker at the time, began using U.S. Air Force planes for travel to and from his district for security reasons. But a former aide told the Times that Hastert did not use military planes to regularly transport his family, and Pelosi's request goes beyond what Hastert received.

Pelosi has used military aircraft for at least one trip back to her San Francisco district.

U.S. Air Force travel for members of Congress is first-rate, according to the Times. The aircraft are staffed with stewards who serve meals and tend an open bar, and communications suites allow members to conduct business while traveling.

© NewsMax 2007. All rights reserved.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 last
To: InvisibleChurch
The answer to bella pelosi should be just one word....NO!

The military families/dependants are not allowed to travel on military transport in the Continental U.S. so what makes her think she and her family members should be given that right. Only under dire emergencies such as another 9/11 should she alone be allowed but only as a means to get her to a secure area. [personally I'd prefer they just left her where she was, in harm's way].

If she and her family are given the O.K. there's going to be a lot of military very, very p***** off.

In the last month her ego has swelled so much if it wasn't for all the Botox plastic in her head, it would explode.

I detest this individual [and all the other RATs in her commie party], and would not shed one tear if one weekend when she was home, the San Andreas broke SF off and floated with her intact far out into the ocean, then sank.
61 posted on 02/01/2007 1:57:35 PM PST by AmeriBrit (RUDY/ THOMPSON /NEWT- 2008 [in any order])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

to the torp


62 posted on 02/01/2007 5:09:36 PM PST by InvisibleChurch (Nothing ruins a good buzz like a moment of clarity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson