1 posted on
02/01/2007 8:27:25 AM PST by
tobyhill
To: tobyhill
Gee I hope they have counsel representing them. /s
To: AdmSmith; Dog
Pong
And how exactly did they get the GMC Suburbans?
3 posted on
02/01/2007 8:30:01 AM PST by
nuconvert
([there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business] (...but his head is so tiny...))
To: tobyhill
I suspect there are traitors embedded in the government, just as we have the "terrorist sympathizers" and "treasonous citizens" embedded in our own government....those who have their agenda, and will do whatever the moonbats and lunatics think will show the "evilness" and "America is an international pariah".....
To: tobyhill
The ARVN factor arises again
and again
and again
just a fact of life.....it will keep on keepin' on, just like a Phoenix.......and it screams for a Phoenix program
To: tobyhill
With all the Baathists and Republican Guard who melted back into the population, should this be a surprise?
14 posted on
02/01/2007 8:43:57 AM PST by
FixitGuy
(By their fruits shall ye know them!)
To: tobyhill
Because high-level generals were possibly involved, the Pentagon said, it raises questions about the loyalty and trustworthiness of Iraqi military officers at the highest levels.Senior level generals means they were Generals for Saddam, too. ALL those types should have been purged at the outset and the folks at least two levels down promoted into their slots. General Officers...generally speaking...are specifically political A$$ Kissers. While Colonels have stars in their eyes, those already saddled with stars are now looking for that nice cushy retirement job. Iraqis are no different. At that level they're looking to serve the NEXT boss. Their fate should mirror Saddam's. Except that instead of the rope they should face a firing squad.
16 posted on
02/01/2007 8:51:10 AM PST by
ExSoldier
(Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
To: tobyhill
String 'em up, string 'em up
Hang 'em, hang 'em!
18 posted on
02/01/2007 9:01:30 AM PST by
AD from SpringBay
(We have the government we allow and deserve.)
To: tobyhill
Let the buddies of the five American soldiers murdered decide what to do with the Generals.
I have a feeling the outcome will be quite satisfactory!
19 posted on
02/01/2007 9:09:42 AM PST by
HardStarboard
(The Democrats are more afraid of American Victory than Defeat!)
To: tobyhill
From article: "The Pentagon said the investigation into the attack is ongoing and several Iraqis have been detained for questioning.
Because high-level generals were possibly involved, the Pentagon said, it raises questions about the loyalty and trustworthiness of Iraqi military officers at the highest levels.
***
20 posted on
02/01/2007 9:35:50 AM PST by
Alia
To: tobyhill
They still got that noose they used on Saddam?
21 posted on
02/01/2007 9:48:49 AM PST by
oldbill
To: tobyhill
Because high-level generals were possibly involved, the Pentagon said, it raises questions about the loyalty and trustworthiness of Iraqi military officers at the highest levels.
Does NO ONE read the Koran??? If they're Muhammadan, they're going to lie. What's so hard to understand about that?
They want to take over the world for Muhammad and some non-Muhammadan is asking if they are trustworthy? Yeah, they can be trusted to spread Muhammadanism and to lie if need be to do so.
It's not racist, it's not mean spirited, it's not hateful to state the obvious. Muhammadans cannot be trusted to tell the honest truth.
30 posted on
02/01/2007 10:18:51 AM PST by
HighlyOpinionated
(Everybody should have the right to carry a firearm openly. And to use it if necessary.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson