Posted on 01/31/2007 10:06:06 AM PST by rellimpank
Conservatives blame Republicans for losing Congress. Are they right?
Conservatives are offering a curious explanation for the drubbing they took at the polls: they blame the Republicans. The 2006 elections were not a conservative defeat, you see; they were a Republican one, a rejection of a party that had strayed too far from the conservative path. John McCain put the point nicely: "Americans had elected us to change government, and they rejected us because they believed government had changed us."
The corollary is that McCain--along with many other, more reliable conservative spokesmen--believes that most Americans remain quietly conservative. But this latent center-right majority, he argues, needs reassuring that in 2008 the GOP will once again hew to true-blue (pardon the term) conservative principles.
In their hearts, he knows they're Right.
(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...
I disagree.
VALUES are the key. Persuasion only works when there values for the long haul to stand upon when doing the persuading.
Informericials can be quite persuasive. And they sell overpriced, overblown stuff meant to give the proprietor a quick buck.
But you don't get many repeat customers. You are basically looking for one-time suckers.
Now, if you are selling a quality product, you attract buyers AND retain them.
Kinda like what Reagan did. He did not promote an anti-communist, pro-life position because focus groups and polls told him that was a winning position. He BELIEVED in those things. And from that position, he was able to PERSUADE people to come to his point of view - voters that that were considered unreachable for the GOP, such as centrist Democrats.
That is the POWER of belief and values. And the core reason the GOP is in such bad shape is they LOST SUCH.
And until they get it back - that they give voters a reason to BELIEVE in them, instead of just saying vote for us, we ain't as bad as the other guyz - they will continue to flounder.
gratuitous ping to posts 58 and 61
Spot on, dude!
Hey, spot on again! Be careful, you might be attacked for telling the truth!
And rudderless ships eventually end up on the rocks.
ROTFLMAO! You should be at the Improv!
Well said, db.
Touche!
No kidding. The marketing of conservative principles has been awful for a long time. Still, despite that we have managed to win often. Improving marketing, and actual clear thinking, would help the GOP a lot.
See my post #58.
The Dems got smart enough to run a pro-life Dem against him with name recognition.
And Santorum was dumb enough to get too deep into corporatism in what is still a very blue-collar, lunchbox state.
That can be a very lethal combination, as he found out.
I can see it now. Vote for [insert blow-dried brain-dead Senator/Governor here]. He slices! He dices! He eliminates terrorists and unsightly mildew!
It ain't about marketing. It's about having something worthwhile to market.
One of the consistent problems on FR is the idea that most of the american electorate is as conservative as FR is. It's nowhere close, and the more narrow the Freeper conventional wisdom gets, the more it deviates from having a clear evaluation of the general electorate.
There were Freepers insisting to the very end that the 2006 elections would actually show stunning GOP gains. Others assured themselves of an upset in the Florida Senate race. Denial ain't a river in Egypt.
One of the consistent problems on FR is the idea that most of the american electorate is as conservative as FR is. It's nowhere close, and the more narrow the Freeper conventional wisdom gets, the more it deviates from having a clear evaluation of the general electorate.
There were Freepers insisting to the very end that the 2006 elections would actually show stunning GOP gains. Others assured themselves of an upset in the Florida Senate race. Denial ain't a river in Egypt.
You know, that post was good enough to post twice. :-)
You continually surprise me with your thoughts.
The success of Bill Clinton and his status as popular former president doesn't support your thinking.
Good one!
Conservatism is more than pro life. Santorum was clearly the conservative candidate in that race, and he lost handily.
Contrary to popular belief, the electorate is fully capable of rejecting a conservative.
Posted twice because of a forgotten ping!
What's so surprising with my thoughts?
The success of Bill Clinton is due largely to the fact that Bush the Elder both broke a fundamental campaign pledge and really didn't seem all that driven to win a second term.
And it was also due to the fact that the GOP accepted the notion that a hack Senator somehow was the guy to beat him as an incumbent.
In other words, the GOP first ran a guy who betrayed his values. And then ran a guy who had no values.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.