Posted on 01/31/2007 10:06:06 AM PST by rellimpank
Conservatives blame Republicans for losing Congress. Are they right?
Conservatives are offering a curious explanation for the drubbing they took at the polls: they blame the Republicans. The 2006 elections were not a conservative defeat, you see; they were a Republican one, a rejection of a party that had strayed too far from the conservative path. John McCain put the point nicely: "Americans had elected us to change government, and they rejected us because they believed government had changed us."
The corollary is that McCain--along with many other, more reliable conservative spokesmen--believes that most Americans remain quietly conservative. But this latent center-right majority, he argues, needs reassuring that in 2008 the GOP will once again hew to true-blue (pardon the term) conservative principles.
In their hearts, he knows they're Right.
(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...
LOL.
Gee, I don't know. Why?
nice pic
Somehow I doubt that Conservatives and Republicans are the same anymore.
No, it's defining the problem. The question is, has the Big Tent grown so large that it includes both sides of everything, or has it been re pitched farther Left, leaving the conservatives in the cold? Has the GOP, in its desire to capture the lukewarm, uninterested middleground neglected the needs and wants of its own Right, to the point that they feel the Party has left them?
What does the brand name "Republican" mean? What are you getting when you buy it? How can you tell what's in the package, at a minimum, before you open it? Without a great deal more consistency in agenda and message from the GOP, you can't.
One, McCain is not a conservative!
Two, I believe two central issues hurt Republicans with the Conservative base: they blew it with judicial nominations, allowing the Gang of Fourteen to reach a compromise that let the Dems off the hook for their obstructionism; they did not take any definitive action to close the borders or even deal with illegals.
BTW..I am glad to see you back.
Did you get a new computer?
that about sums it up
What is means is that it's one of the TWO choices on the ballot.
Who is the nominee for the Conservative Party?
OMG, do NOT link me to that idiot. Geez.........LOL.
LOL
Maybe he should clone himself to get a candidate that could run
But something tells me he'd vote against his clone for not being perfect
ROTFLOL
"Vote for me because I'm not the other guy" is a losing strategy, especially when you are the "in" party with a razor thin margin. It is the prevent-defense, and it failed miserably in 2006. The GOP lost many very close races in 2006, largely because many voters saw no choices or nearly identical choices on the ballot, and either stayed home, or the precious middle muddle pulled the lever for the other guy who promised them more this time. When you have major candidates who are for and against every issue that Republican voters care about, the label designation means nothing.
As a Party, are we for or against:
Abortion
Gun control laws
Border control
Nationalized health care
Tax reform
Increasing Borrowing
Increasing Spending
Amnesty/Immigration law reform
Aggressive WOT
Cutting troop levels
Adding troop levels
Going after terrorist supporting States
Negotiating with terrorist supporting States
Ignoring terrorist supporting States
Federalized education control
Social Security reform
Property rights protection
Fed funded scientific agendas, such as stem cells and climate
Judicial activism
Separation of powers
Protection of public display of religion
Free Trade
Reciprocal and/or protectionist tariffs
"War on drugs"
Homosexual marriage/unions
Affirmative action set-asides and quotas
Nuclear power
Coal power
Any other power that gets Fed $
The Republican Party and its office holders are all over the map on these and a host of other issues. WHAT DO THEY STAND FOR AND AGAINST UNEQUIVOCABLY? What defines the word "Republican"?
If the GOP doesn't get its crap together, it just might be facing one. Remember Perot? He stole the "issue" voters from both sides, enough to give Bubba the plurality he needed in two elections. I don't want to see that happen again, but it will if the GOP doesn't reintegrate itself with its core values. The middle is too fickle to depend on at the cost of the base.
Imagine, if you will, a McCain just aced out of the nomination, and going Indie, with a Leiberman wingmate. Think he could carve out Perot size numbers enough to scuttle a rudderless GOP? I do.
The middle is too fickle to depend on at the cost of the base.
The base ALWAYS votes GOP; it's the far right wing that does the blackmailing.
I think maybe the GOP has finally realized that they can't depend on the far right and now, instead of getting more from the GOP, you're gonna get LESS.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.