[Dave S]

Tell us why you think your choice for pubbie candidate would make a president?

My three: McCain, Giuliani, and Romney, all have a strong chance of winning the general election. That is something that Hunter supporters cant say.

[Fierce Allegiance]

My three: McCain, Giuliani, and Romney, all have a strong chance of winning the general election.

So do Hillary and Obama, ESPECIALLY if we roll out a conservative-lite candidate. Heck, Richardson could swamp the middle ground voters, and fairly easily be made to look more conservative-freindly than Rudy - without much effort.

[william clark]

Okay, let's put talk of "delusional" to the side for the moment. I'll ask this in all seriousness.

Never mind whether Republican-base conservatives would vote for them. The winning candidate will need to be able to appeal to voters from both sides of the middle. Why would any left-of-center voters, especially women, vote for any of those three, given that Hillary paints herself as moderate, but the leftists know better and will turn out for her in spite of that?

DH4WH

[NapkinUser]

My three: McCain, Giuliani, and Romney, all have a strong chance of winning the general election.

Only if you're gullible enough to believe whatever the mainstream media tells you.

[blackie]

"My three: McCain, Giuliani, and Romney, all have a strong chance of winning the general election. That is something that Hunter supporters cant say."

Conservatives will not vote for those three. Why do you think the liberals took control again ~ conservatives didn't vote.

That's an old curmudgeon's view. >:-}

[Antoninus]

My three: McCain, Giuliani, and Romney, all have a strong chance of winning the general election.

Wrong. The each have no chance. All, to a certain extent, are party-splitters. If the GOP (God forbid!) nominates one of these three liberals, it leaves them exposed to a 3rd party challenge on the right. Do you honestly think the Dems and MSM are stupid enough to let such an opportunity go by the wayside? I'm telling you right now--they're not.

Did we learn nothing from 1992??