Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cervical Cancer Vaccine: Life Saver or Teen Sex-Life Catalyst?
playfuls.com ^ | 1/31/07

Posted on 01/31/2007 4:01:47 AM PST by XR7

A bill concerning the mandatory vaccination of US middle-aged schoolgirls against cervical cancer is considered controversial and some states even try to pull it back.

The vaccine is only produced by Merck Sharp & Dohme (Merck & Co) and is called Gardasil. This is the world’s first vaccine against cervical cancer and other diseases caused by certain types of the human papillomavirus (HPV).

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Gardasil for mass-prescription on June 8, 2006, after a lot of clinical tests. The tests also indicated that Gardasil’s administratin to girls should occur before they become sexually active.

According to statistics, 270,000 women died of cervical cancer worldwide in 2002, making this form of cancer one of the deadliest. In the US, cervical cancer killed around 3,700 women in 2002.

Some states (through their Senate representatives) are not convinced yet of the efficacy of the vaccine. Sen. Delores G. Kelley, a Baltimore County Democrat, said yesterday that she plans to pull a bill she herself sponsored that calls for all sixth-grade girls to be vaccinated by September 2008. She voiced the concern of some parents and educators that addressed her, after chickenpox and hepatitis B vaccinations failed to immunize students from grades six to nine.

The success of the vaccine in clinical tests and FDA’s approval has determined more than a dozen states to consider introducing the mandatory vaccination with Gardasil. Some medical experts and watchdog groups have questioned though Merck’s active lobbying, although the company’s involvement is not a surprise, since it is for the moment the only producer of the substance. The groups and the medical experts also imply that state mandates are premature.

Sen. Kelley said she was not aware of "those external politics."

"The timing is just not right," she said, adding that she will likely introduce the bill again next year. "I decided to do this at a time when things have settled down and we can approach this in a more deliberative manner."

Gardasil is given in 3 injections over 6 months, namely at enrollment, and 2 and 6 months later. Gardasil protects against four subtypes that together account for 70 per cent of all cervical cancers and 90 per cent of genital warts. It has been shown to be more than 95-per-cent effective.

Some conservatives and parental-rights groups say such a requirement would encourage premarital sex and interfere with the way they raise their children. Some fear the HPV vaccine’s protection would boost young girls’ appetite for an early sexual life.

For other critics, it is the notion that their youthful innocence could be violated, during the course of three shots over six months, by a medical practitioner's potential sex-education lecture.

But Merck said its lobbying efforts have been aboveboard.

Merck has funneled money through Women in Government, an advocacy group of female state legislators.

An official from Merck’s vaccine division sits on Women in Government's business council, and many of the bills around the country have been introduced by members of Women in Government.

"Cervical cancer is of particular interest to our members because it represents the first opportunity that we have to actually eliminate a cancer," said Susan Crosby, president of Women in Government.

Merck spokeswoman Janet Skidmore would not say how much the company is spending on lobbyists or how much it has donated to Women in Government. Crosby also declined to specify how much the drug company gave.

But Skidmore said: "We disclosed the fact that we provide funding to this organization. We're not in any way trying to obscure that."

The New Jersey drug company, which is building a vaccine plant in Durham, could generate billions in sales if Gardasil -- at $360 for the three-shot regimen -- were made mandatory across the country. Most insurance companies now cover the vaccine, which has been shown to have no serious side effects.

The National Advisory Committee on Immunization says girls and women aged 14 to 26 should also be vaccinated against human papillomavirus (HPV) even if they are already sexually active, because they may not yet have been infected.

Rep. Debbie Clary, a Cleveland County Republican, has no doubt that a North Carolina legislator eventually will introduce a bill requiring HPV vaccination. "I don't know if it will be this year or the next, but I'm certain it will be discussed," she said. "It's obvious that Merck is pushing for mandates."

"I think it will be a tremendous debate, because you're treading on territory that is a parent's decision," Clary said.

On June 29, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended that Gardasil be placed on the childhood immunization schedule at the 11 to 12 year old visit. They also recommended that the vaccine be included in the federal Vaccines for Children Program, which would provide the vaccines free of charge to children under the age of 18 who are uninsured. Merck & Co., Inc. is a global research-driven pharmaceutical company. Established in 1891, Merck discovers, develops, manufactures and markets vaccines and medicines to address unmet medical needs.


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: abortion; cervicalcancer; gardasil; gardisil; hpv; lobbyists; merck; naral; plannedbarrenhood; prolife; radicalfeminism; schoolgirls; std; universalhealthcare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-266 next last
To: Bushwacker777

I wouldn't go so far as to call it child abuse but I agree with you in that I'd have this vaccine given to my child in a heartbeat.

My son is 30 and has been in two long term relationships (5 years or more) since he started dating at the age of seventeen. I wouldn't call him promiscuous. If the vaccine were to be proven effective in men his age, I'd urge him to take advantage of it.


41 posted on 01/31/2007 4:48:07 AM PST by Sally'sConcerns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; neverdem; Pyro7480; Mr. Silverback; A.A. Cunningham; stfassisi; Obilisk18; netvictory; ..

ping.


42 posted on 01/31/2007 4:49:27 AM PST by XR7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup
"An STD gives one the cancer"

More correctly, this STD left untreated, can (not always) cancer. If these girls were checked regularly, it could be discovered and treated before it develops into cancer, which takes years of untreated infection to do.

Meanwhile, the little disease carrier is a host, spreading the disease by either being used as a sperm depoitory, or sharing her dildo with her friends; after all, they teach "sex is fun and gay sex is fun too" in schools now.

43 posted on 01/31/2007 4:50:40 AM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: XR7

If this prevented dick cancer, it would have been mandatory yesterday.


44 posted on 01/31/2007 4:51:40 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sally'sConcerns

Again, this disease does NOT affect men. They don't have a cervix.


45 posted on 01/31/2007 4:53:00 AM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: jalisco555
" It will simply prevent unnecessary early deaths."

Or cause even more. Regardless, if you want to innoculate your kid, do so, it's your gamble. But no way will I allow you to force my kid to be. And no way will I pay for yours.

46 posted on 01/31/2007 4:55:16 AM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
Pumping all of our girls full of a queationable vaccine, while all of our boys are already being injected with psychotropic drugs, while corporate entities make billions doing so.........?

Sounds like the criminal activity of a totalitarian state.

Mandatory medication needs to be outlawed!!!

47 posted on 01/31/2007 4:55:36 AM PST by desertlily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary; Sally'sConcerns
Again, this disease does NOT affect men. They don't have a cervix.

Uncircumcised men have a foreskin that that is susceptible to infection with HPV.

48 posted on 01/31/2007 4:55:46 AM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary; Sally'sConcerns
Again, this disease does NOT affect men. They don't have a cervix.

Uncircumcised men have a foreskin that that is susceptible to infection with HPV.

49 posted on 01/31/2007 4:56:06 AM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
Pumping all of our girls full of a questionable vaccine, while all of our boys are already being injected with psychotropic drugs and corporate entities are make billions doing so.........?

Sounds like the criminal activity of a totalitarian state.

Mandatory medication needs to be outlawed!!!

50 posted on 01/31/2007 5:00:02 AM PST by desertlily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
And no way will I pay for yours.

LOL
If the government says you will, you will.

51 posted on 01/31/2007 5:02:23 AM PST by XR7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

ping.


52 posted on 01/31/2007 5:03:58 AM PST by XR7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

"I think the vaccine should be given to boys and men. They're at least half the transmission vectors for HPV, and fair is fair."

Careful, your common sense is showing.


53 posted on 01/31/2007 5:04:44 AM PST by poobear (Carter & Clinton - 'The Latter Day Church Of Jew Haters & Horndogs')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jalisco555

Yes boosters would do it, but why push to have 7 and 8 year old girls vaccinated?


54 posted on 01/31/2007 5:05:54 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: XR7
Dear mercy...
..I knew they would make it mandatory.
55 posted on 01/31/2007 5:09:27 AM PST by Guenevere (Duncan Hunter for President....2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
That would be the life imitating art scenario.

Actually, I missed a better drug example. Look at the wonder drugs for depression, don't all of them come with a new warning that they have a different effect on teenagers? Cures grown men but makes children suicidal, IIRC. Now perhaps the drug companies are simply vaccinating themselves against trial lawyers but the key point is the age effect. Suing Merck into oblivion will be little solace if we cause irreparable harm to a generation of girls.

56 posted on 01/31/2007 5:10:57 AM PST by NonValueAdded (Pelosi, the call was for Comity, not Comedy. But thanks for the laughs. StarKisses, NVA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
No, foreskin is not subject to infection by this virus. It only provides a hiding spot that MAY allow the virus to survive longer TOPICALLY.

A shot will have NO EFFECT on the survival of a virus carried TOPICALLY.

Wash.

Maybe women should be circumsized too, the folds of the labia can do the same thing, therefore even if they get the shot, they can still spread the disease topically.

57 posted on 01/31/2007 5:14:23 AM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: XR7
"If the government says you will, you will."

You got me there....

58 posted on 01/31/2007 5:19:08 AM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
That is in no way the deadliest form of cancer in the USA.

Cervical cancer deaths have dropped by around 80% in the US due to mass Pap smear screening. Prior to the 50's it was the second leading cause of cancer death among American women, topped only by breast cancer.

59 posted on 01/31/2007 5:24:29 AM PST by jalisco555 ("Dogs look up to us, cats look down on us and pigs treat us as equals" Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: poobear
Men do not carry the disease. Giving boys the shot would be useless.

They only spread it topically, by contact. They don't have a warm moist orface where the disease can multiply and reproduce.

The male represents the q-tip dipped in the breeding chamber, then transfering the virus to another breeding chamber. It's done TOPICALLY, ie on the outside of the penis.

60 posted on 01/31/2007 5:26:00 AM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-266 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson