Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HAL9000

""The experts said Bill Clinton couldn't win either.""

Very true but the Perot factor was huge in that election. No Perot and probably no Clinton.


17 posted on 01/30/2007 11:05:13 PM PST by volunbeer (Dear heaven.... we really need President Reagan again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: volunbeer
Very true but the Perot factor was huge in that election. No Perot and probably no Clinton.

We'll never know. Clinton won his party's nomination, so it's possible he could have won without Perot in the race.

I think Bill Clinton won because he is "an unusually good liar", as Bob Kerrey put it.

25 posted on 01/30/2007 11:29:31 PM PST by HAL9000 (Get a Mac - The Ultimate FReeping Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson