Skip to comments.
Robert E. Lee: Icon of the South -- and American Hero
American Spectator ^
| 1/30/07
| HW Crocker III
Posted on 01/30/2007 11:33:39 AM PST by RayStacy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-335 next last
To: Boiler Plate
A very famous 1 at that. ;-)
41
posted on
01/30/2007 12:18:30 PM PST
by
the OlLine Rebel
(Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
To: RayStacy
42
posted on
01/30/2007 12:20:42 PM PST
by
Southern Partisan
("Do your duty in all things. You cannot do more. You should never wish to do less." ----R. E. Lee)
To: RayStacy
How many of you noticed, or celebrated yourselves, Lee's birthday on 19 January (or Stonewall Jackson's on 21 January)?Well, since I knew I was going to be busy on the 19th and the 21st, I celebrated both on the 15th of January.
I even took a monday holiday for it.
43
posted on
01/30/2007 12:21:38 PM PST
by
OldSmaj
(Death to islam. I am now and will always be, a sworn enemy of all things muslim.)
To: 13Sisters76
I hadn't heard of any agenda against the Stone Mountain Memorial. How organized an effort is there? Any links?
44
posted on
01/30/2007 12:22:57 PM PST
by
rockrr
(Never argue with a man who buys ammo in bulk...)
To: RayStacy
![](http://www.oldgloryprints.com/Robert_E_Lee_by_Schmehl.jpg)
General Robert E. Lee, leader of the Confederate army, won the respect of North and South alike. In fact General Lee was loved and admired the world over. Sir Garnet Joseph Woseley from England, who met Lee on several occasions wrote: "I never felt my own individual insignificance more keenly then I did in his presence. I have met many of the great men of my time, but Lee alone impressed me with the feeling that I was in the presence of a man who was cast in a grander mold, and made of a different and finer metal than all other men.'' General Lee was the very embodiment of all that was good in the Confederate States of America, and to this very day is loved and admired by any one that has a knowledge of history...
45
posted on
01/30/2007 12:27:12 PM PST
by
groanup
(Limited government is the answer. Now, what's the question?)
To: Boiler Plate
Well he did get a riverboat named after him.And a car.
46
posted on
01/30/2007 12:28:37 PM PST
by
Zeroisanumber
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: 13Sisters76
Right now, they are trying to gin up interest in destroying the memorial at Stone Mountain.![](http://rvforsaleguide.com/images/stone-mountain-picture-2.jpg)
L - R: Davis, Lee, Jackson
47
posted on
01/30/2007 12:31:01 PM PST
by
groanup
(Limited government is the answer. Now, what's the question?)
To: rockrr
Truthfully, I don't know- I heard it mentioned at work. I never sought out any of the facts because I have a feeling it isn't going very far. I'll poke around and see what I can find...
48
posted on
01/30/2007 12:31:44 PM PST
by
13Sisters76
("It is amazing how many people mistake a certain hip snideness for sophistication. " Thos. Sowell)
To: fredhead
I believe the Government was forcrd to make restitution to the Lee family later after one of his sons filed suit.
49
posted on
01/30/2007 12:33:08 PM PST
by
BnBlFlag
(Deo Vindice/Semper Fidelis "Ya gotta saddle up your boys; Ya gotta draw a hard line")
To: the OlLine Rebel
Just a side note... Lee is the only cadet to ever graduate West Point without a single demerit, he was also second in his class.
Members of Kappa Alpha Order - Which was founded at Washington and Lee College still celebrate Lee's Birthday every year and strive to be gentleman just like Lee.
To: RayStacy
The War was indeed over the issue of states rights...the right of the states to continue slavery inspite of the federal government. The Civil War resolved the slavery issue that had not been resolved when the US Constitution was written, and had been a problem ever since.
That Lee believed that the Confederacy had only exercised its rights as guaranteed under the Constitution, defended by the founders, and invoked by states and statesmen "for the last seventy years," can be seen in his letter of 15 December 1866 to Lord Acton, in which he says precisely that. He wishes that "the judgment of reason" had not "been displaced by the arbitrament of war," but concludes it has been, and it is time for the South to move on, to accept "without reserve... the extinction of slavery.... [A]n event that has been long sought, though in a different way, and by none... more earnestly desired than by citizens of Virginia," and to "trust that the constitution may undergo no [further] change, but that it may be handed down to our succeeding generations in the form we received it from our forefathers."
As they were seeking English help, it was wise to speak so. The English weren't about to help the secessionist promote slavery.
It is too easy for Lee to side step the slavery issue by saying he was falling in with his family and friends on state's rights to practice slavery.
51
posted on
01/30/2007 12:42:16 PM PST
by
TheDon
(Are you a cut and run conservative?)
To: Non-Sequitur; fredhead
Actually Lee never owned Arlington himself. When George Custis died, he left the plantation to his daughter Mary Custis Lee, and then in turn to her son, George Custis Lee.
To: TheDon
You can certainly count expansion of slavery in the west among the issues of secession which were vast and complex. You can also count on one hand the number of Union soldiers who went to war to "end slavery". Wasn't an issue save for a few abolitionists in New England.
53
posted on
01/30/2007 12:53:48 PM PST
by
groanup
(Limited government is the answer. Now, what's the question?)
To: Thrusher; RayStacy; Non-Sequitur
I am a Southerner and was taught early as a child that Sherman was evil, not quite on Hitler or Stalin's level, but close. In Georgia, his name was generally spoken as a curse.
I love history and because I received a heavy dose of the history of the War Between the States in my youth, I found it more interesting to study European and Ancient History in college and later in life. Still, the history of that awful war still resonates in modern times.
We have gone from treating my Southern ancestors that fought for the CSA as heroes to misguided bigoted slave holders. Yes, my ancestors had slaves. I am told from my Grandparents, parents and Aunt that our ancestors worked in the fields alongside the slaves.
Back to the issue. William T. Sherman changed history, because his tactics included destroying the economic base of the keystone state of the South (Georgia). In fact, his troops destroyed my Mother's family plantation. From an objective view, Sherman anticipated the future of warfare. I agree that we could use some tougher tactics than have been the case. However, in a counterinsurgency operation, destroying the enemy is hard until you figure out just who the enemy really is.
Lee and Sherman, in their own way were both true American heroes.
To: RayStacy
"What, exactly, is the bone of contention?"
I don't even want to go into it. Anything connected to the Civil War gets pretty nasty sometimes.
55
posted on
01/30/2007 12:58:26 PM PST
by
dljordan
To: RayStacy
President Eisenhower had four portraits displayed in his White House office, one being Robert E Lee.
56
posted on
01/30/2007 1:01:39 PM PST
by
Pelham
(California, Mexico's HMO)
To: Thrusher
Actually you should be wishing that Gen. Lee was still around today. A true gentleman to be sure, he was also one of the most brilliant tacticians in the world. Many of his military maneuvers were taught in the most noble institutions in this country. Sherman, for all his own brilliance, was awed by Lee.
And yes, here in 'Bama we had a big celebration for General Lees' birthday - we just did it on Martin Luther King Jr. Day :)
57
posted on
01/30/2007 1:06:17 PM PST
by
Shadowstrike
(Be polite, Be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet.)
To: 13Sisters76
Is Stone Mountain itself private property? I know that Stone Mountain Park is at least privately run by some outfit called "Silver Dollar," but I don't know if they actually own the land around the base of the rock and/or the rock and the carving itself.
}:-)4
58
posted on
01/30/2007 1:10:14 PM PST
by
Moose4
(I don't speed in Durham--if I get pulled for 65 in a 55, Mike Nifong'll have me doing 15 to life.)
To: Thrusher
There sure wouldn't be anything left worth keeping.
To: groanup
Quite right. They weren't about to let the Union be destroyed so that Southerners could keep their slaves. :^)
60
posted on
01/30/2007 1:18:08 PM PST
by
TheDon
(Are you a cut and run conservative?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-335 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson