Replies

And what it does is exclude DevGru from federal unionization rules. It has absolutely bupkus to do with TWA800.

Actually, it governs a range of things far beyond unionization, the Federal labor Relations act governs measures applying to the federal employees of such things as the Federal Whistleblower act.

For you to consciously MISREPERESENT what Executive Order 13039's impact was, can only have been so as to MISLEAD the followers of this thread. You attempted to ham-handedly palm off the Red Herring of "unionization rules" instead of the broader federal employment rule impacts...and this bad faith on your part was egregious.

See Executive Order 12171

Actually, it governs a range of things far beyond unionization, the Federal labor Relations act governs measures applying to the federal employees of such things as the Federal Whistleblower act.

Yes. military special operators and the handful of civilians that work in military special operations are not subject to "such things as the whistleblower act." They are the only people covered in 13039, which again has complete bupkus to do with the naval units mentioned by Ian Goddard in his raving web page, or with TWA Flight 800 in any way.

Apparently all you loons who were too busy hiding from ZOG to try out for military special operations didn't pick up on that.

For you to consciously MISREPERESENT what Executive Order 13039's impact was, can only have been so as to MISLEAD the followers of this thread.

Sorry. I am exactly stating what EO 13039s impact was. Nobody on USS Grasp or Grapple was covered by it. Maybe some SEAL diver who pitched in to bring stuff up was, but the purpose of the EO is clearly to protect the routine operations of Development Group from public revelation, and nothing to do with TWA800, in which DevGru's involvement is unproven (and frankly, doubtful. They are great fellows but not your first call for investigation).

this bad faith on your part was egregious.

You and your conspiracy-minded confederates are the ones demonstrating bad faith, as any reasonable reader of the published materials can see. Your attempt to "prove" that this EO is part of a cover-up when it doesn't even relate to the elements you guys say it does is pathetic. Shouting louder in capital letters doesn't make a fellow more persuasive.

I can prove that there is no massive conspiracy to suppress the truth in two steps.

All you loons say that the government will stop at nothing to cover this up, even murdering hundreds (or covering for the murder of hundreds).
None of you loons "speaking truth to power" have been murdered.

Conclusion: they're not murdering folks now, and they weren't doing it in 1996, either. They don't really need to: I would imagine that the real criminal investigators, FBI agents, etc. that you guys malign so enthusiastically, just laugh at you. I know for a fact that the aircraft accident investigators and scientists involved (like the ones at Cal Tech's EDL) just kind of shake their heads, pity you, and wonder about the basic state of science education in America.

If "they" were really murdering people, you'd be in line to get whacked. You and I both know that isn't going to happen. Eat right and exercise, and you should be able to rave for many more years yet.

d.o.l.

Criminal Number 18F