Yes. military special operators and the handful of civilians that work in military special operations are not subject to "such things as the whistleblower act." They are the only people covered in 13039, which again has complete bupkus to do with the naval units mentioned by Ian Goddard in his raving web page, or with TWA Flight 800 in any way.
Apparently all you loons who were too busy hiding from ZOG to try out for military special operations didn't pick up on that.
For you to consciously MISREPERESENT what Executive Order 13039's impact was, can only have been so as to MISLEAD the followers of this thread.
Sorry. I am exactly stating what EO 13039s impact was. Nobody on USS Grasp or Grapple was covered by it. Maybe some SEAL diver who pitched in to bring stuff up was, but the purpose of the EO is clearly to protect the routine operations of Development Group from public revelation, and nothing to do with TWA800, in which DevGru's involvement is unproven (and frankly, doubtful. They are great fellows but not your first call for investigation).
this bad faith on your part was egregious.
You and your conspiracy-minded confederates are the ones demonstrating bad faith, as any reasonable reader of the published materials can see. Your attempt to "prove" that this EO is part of a cover-up when it doesn't even relate to the elements you guys say it does is pathetic. Shouting louder in capital letters doesn't make a fellow more persuasive.
I can prove that there is no massive conspiracy to suppress the truth in two steps.
If "they" were really murdering people, you'd be in line to get whacked. You and I both know that isn't going to happen. Eat right and exercise, and you should be able to rave for many more years yet.
d.o.l.
Criminal Number 18F
This is also false. You're on a roll. It explicitly added that unit. Hence, your disinformation operation is blowing up in your face.
And you know it.
You've already started calling everyone who is investigating this, whichever side they are actually on..."loons". And your continued evasion and further misrepresentation can be filed in the circular orifice because it is clear...you make no acknowledgement of your error about "UNIONIZATION" as the point of the EO.
I am exactly stating what EO 13039s impact was.
No, you're not. You're MISREPRESENTING it.
Now your claims as to it only applying to "special operators" and the "handful of civilians" that work in the military special ops...are totally unsupported. And you have established NEGATIVE PERSONAL CREDIBILITY. We're supposed to take your word that that the EO had no operational relevance to the Flight 800 recovery and investigation. I.e., "Move along. Nothing to see here." That's why Bubba announced his blizzard of EOs over in England right after Flight 800? Just a coincidence. Totally normal procedure. Happens all the time. Rooooight.
Hard to fathom how being a Clinton-defending stooge, such as you are, is in any way better than being a supposedly paranoid loon.
What is so damned important about defending the Clintons for you that you disgrace yourself this way?