Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Beginning of the the End of Hillary Clinton's Campaign for President
http://www.defeatconquer.com ^ | 1/29/2007 | John Estrada

Posted on 01/29/2007 11:05:46 PM PST by johnestrada

Beginning of the End of Hillary's Campaign for President


TOPICS: Editorial; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: badactress; badevilwoman; clintonterm3; election; goingsenile; hillary; hilliary; politicalhack; politics; president
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last
The beginning of the end of Hillary’s Campaign

Just think Hillary cannot stand up to Bill’s extra sidebars now they are trying to make it sound like she can stand up to bad and Evil Men. Our next Commander in Chief must be willing to take stands against Dictators, Murderers, and Bandits. Hillary was weak in her house and she would be weak again in the White House. Our Nation needs a Strong Commander in Chief who will deal with the Bad and Evil in the World stage. She might have the most money, and organization for the primary but her campaign is doomed either in the Primary or the General Election because once Americans analyze her statements from the past and her new statements and her campaign volume she will be rejected. The Democratic Party needs to elect a strong leader who will not fold against tough situations. She doesn’t know how to deal with the Iraq situations - let the Republicans handle it is her plan. America must win in Iraq and we cannot have another “Peace with Honor” or a “Bay of Pigs” outcome. The Best strategies for the Democrats should be support our troops because they will defeat and conquer our enemies if we don’t tie up their military tactics and strategies. Our slogan will be “Victory with Honor”.

1 posted on 01/29/2007 11:05:47 PM PST by johnestrada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: johnestrada

Fingers crossed here that she goes down in flames as she should.


2 posted on 01/29/2007 11:09:57 PM PST by tina07 (In Memory of my Father - WWII Army Air Force Veteran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tina07

Women voters gave us Prohibition but have been largely silent since then. It's overdue for the weaker sex to screw up America again. Hillary is the vehicle, and it may well happen.


3 posted on 01/29/2007 11:12:09 PM PST by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: johnestrada

Well .. Rush was playing an audio of Hillary from 2003 in which she was talking to Code Pink. In the audio, she clearly says that she researched the Iraq situation for herself (didn't blame Bush); agreed with info that Saddam was not going to disarm.

However, over the weekend she was claiming Bush tricked her into voting for going into Iraq.

Hmmmmm ..?? "the smartest woman in the world" was tricked by the most unintelligent, incompetent idiot ever born [according to the left]. If that kind of person can trick her, then she is a whole lot more stupid than I thought.


4 posted on 01/29/2007 11:16:54 PM PST by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnestrada

Too optimistic. Never let your guard down.
The general voting population just elected the most anti-American congress since 1974.

People will vote for Hillary in large numbers because
the average woosified American will do so out of guilt.

Heck, the average guy does'nt care if we get our face slapped by the Islamofacists. In fact they probably think we should be punished.


5 posted on 01/29/2007 11:19:38 PM PST by ChiMark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnestrada

Hillary!'s "EVIL MEN" speech is basically a regurgitation of the same garbage the eminated out of John Kerry: his "I'M REPORTING FOR DUTY!" speech. (oh, and BTW, JFnK served in VietNam).


6 posted on 01/29/2007 11:21:13 PM PST by C210N (Bush SPIED, Terrorists DIED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnestrada
She might have the most money,

Without the trappings of actually having to earn it. Seems to be trait with d Democrats. Must be a reason for their popularity, as it is insinuated the Republicans steal their money

7 posted on 01/29/2007 11:24:10 PM PST by oyez ( My karma ran over your dogma.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnestrada
I am a Democrat who supports the effort. Keeping Americans safe must be the president's first mission, and this includes our troops.

Hooray John Estrada!

Our next Commander in Chief must be willing to take stands against Dictators, Murderers, and Bandits.(and Rapists)

8 posted on 01/29/2007 11:28:33 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tina07
Fingers crossed here that she goes down in flames as she should.

Amen.

The thought of that woman as the leader of the free world is a truly frightening one.

9 posted on 01/29/2007 11:31:12 PM PST by Allegra (Hey! Quiet Down Out There!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: johnestrada

She's so poorly-spoken and personally repellent I think the Dems are scrambling for an alternative already. Witness Obama and, recently, Richardson.

Apolitical Americans might just be stupid, but they aren't crazy. She's cooked. Let's just hope they take her train to the station.


10 posted on 01/29/2007 11:31:23 PM PST by IslandJeff (that for every right there is a duty, for every benefit an obligation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnestrada

Hillary is the annointed one. She's got the biggest war chest and the MSM acting as her cheerleader. She's not going away. I don't see any other democrat with the power to overtake her for the nomination.

She's going to run on an agenda of guilting people into voting for her. Guilting people to vote for her because she's a woman, she's a mother, that no woman has ever been president, etc, etc..... and trying to sell everyone that she'll be just like Bill, but minus the baggage.
But I think she's as weak an a candidate as Lurch. She's got tons of political baggage which will hurt her chances.

This is another election where the republicans still have the upperhand and this is an election that is their's to lose. All depends on taking advantage of their situation and running the right pair to get the job done.


11 posted on 01/29/2007 11:36:11 PM PST by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IslandJeff

She's so poorly-spoken and personally repellent.

Lurch was the same thing, but he got the nomination.


12 posted on 01/29/2007 11:37:49 PM PST by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
Women voters gave us Prohibition

It was the same year and the movements were intertwined but Prohibition came first. I think it was the 1920 metrosexuals what done it.

13 posted on 01/29/2007 11:39:03 PM PST by MARTIAL MONK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican

The Dems are, by nature, attuned political creatures. Some focus group somewhere will alert them that Hil has weaknesses among middle America.

They would be wise to recruit another woman (to gather the PC Guilt Vote, as you mentioned) without the former First Lady's baggage. Carol Moseley-Braun? Dianne Feinstein?

Neither of which would stand a chance, of course, given the NY-driven media culture, but Hil will inevitably screw up, big time, and they could use a contingency plan or two.


14 posted on 01/29/2007 11:42:35 PM PST by IslandJeff (that for every right there is a duty, for every benefit an obligation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: johnestrada

What I find laughable is that a woman who's stood by her serial philanderer (at best) no matter what believes she's been "tough" with him.

Actually for once she's telling the truth by implying a parallel between how she deals with Bill and how she would deal with Islamofascists. To wit, mostly she would avert her eyes and pretend nothing was wrong. When absolutely forced into addressing the "evil men" situation by an audacious act, she would get mad, issue strongly worded demands, and lapse into eye-aversion again.

The way she dealt with Bill is identical to the way Bill dealt with OBL.


15 posted on 01/29/2007 11:43:34 PM PST by ellery (The true danger is when liberty is nibbled away, for expedience, and by parts. - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tina07

I want to see her stick around. I don't want the Republican nominee to face Obama. I'd much rather face another lunatic like Hillary. Give her time. She'll implode like Dean did. I just hope it's AFTER she has won the Democrat :D Party primary.


16 posted on 01/29/2007 11:44:00 PM PST by CheyennePress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: johnestrada

They'd take the devil for a country man.
Who'll say this far, no further?


17 posted on 01/29/2007 11:44:33 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life ;o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnestrada

I seriously doubt that she'll be the candidate. She'll take a lot of lefist money down the drain with her too.


18 posted on 01/29/2007 11:48:03 PM PST by TigersEye (Ego chatter endlessly on. Mind speaks in great silence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IslandJeff
She's so poorly-spoken and personally repellent I think the Dems are scrambling for an alternative already. Witness Obama and, recently, Richardson.

She shouts and has a particularly strident tone to her voice. I hope that's how most people see it. I've been of that opinion since I first saw her campaigning for/with her husband in '92....until the campain managers silenced her.

19 posted on 01/29/2007 11:51:07 PM PST by Allegra (Hey! Quiet Down Out There!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CheyennePress

I'd wonder out loud if Howie has another run left in him. He was a true Boutique Darling (much like Gary Hartpence in '84) until the Machine Dems got him in Iowa. Since he organized well from the "outside", they shuffled him off to run the DNC.

Frankly, he might have a score to settle.


20 posted on 01/29/2007 11:51:53 PM PST by IslandJeff (that for every right there is a duty, for every benefit an obligation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson