To: Sleeping Freeper
They have the engineering blueprints. they know where they made the mistakes last time. The Hubble has been a huge success.
Why not build another, or three more? Seems like a no brainer to me.
9 posted on
01/29/2007 1:22:51 PM PST by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
To: finnman69; RadioAstronomer; Physicist; CholeraJoe; sionnsar; patton; NicknamedBob; theDentist; ...
Technically, and theoretically, the Hubble is merely a CIA-designed spy satellite turned outwards from earth towards the heavens, and run by NASA>
Company's (unstated) goal was to use the Hubble to "buy" the very, very expensive furnaces and vacuum rooms for the Hubble fabrication, then use those rooms for their CIA/NSA spy satellites.
but they screwed up the Hubble's calibration and testing/grinding control setup -> My opinion is that they tried to use "cheaper" non-classified/non-experienced/ workers for the Hubble -> and screwed up the mirror.
Rest of Hubble's problems - fixed with the long mission several years ago - were not specifically due to grinding/testing/test calibration errors, but were un-related screw ups.
16 posted on
01/29/2007 1:47:04 PM PST by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson